Mr. RA hired Mathur Law Offices in 2012 after losing TPS and being placed in removal proceedings. Mr. RA grew up in El Salvador but believed that he was a U.S. Citizen by birth. Mr. Mathur defended the case based on Mr. RA's citizenship claim, resulting in the case being administratively closed by ICE. Mr. RA's case was unilaterally reopened in 2017 due to the Trump Administration’s new immigration enforcement policies. Mr. Zumberg researched Mr. RA’s claim and counseled his family on gathering the necessary evidence to prove his citizenship. Ultimately, an agreement was made to dismiss the removal case. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Zumberg.

Mr. K came to Mathur Law Offices as a referral from community members. Mr. K had a same sex partner who shared his apartment. One night the accusation was that the partner was home, and Mr. K returned to ask him to leave. The partner called the police and accused Mr. K of violently assaulting him. While there were severe medical injuries and photos to reflect, the Mathur team realized there are two sides to every story and that photos and medicals alone do not tell the whole tale. After further investigating the case, the Mathur team set forth a written argument before the Dallas County Grand Jury to dismiss the case. After review, Grand Jury agreed and “No Billed” or dismissed the case. Result by Mr. Nieto and Mr. Mathur.

Mr. R's family came to see Mr. Mathur when Mr. R was placed in ICE custody for a second time. Mr. R had previously been removed from the United States as an illegal alien. At the time of his prior deportation, Mr. R had another lawyer who failed to spot a critical issue. In 10 minutes of reviewing the case, Mr. Mathur spotted an issue that showed that Mr. R was entitled to seek "derivative" citizenship based on his mother's application and his father's death. Within a few hours of being retained Mr. Mathur was able to have Mr. R released from custody. Within a few months, Mr. Mathur was able to get USCIS to approve his Certificate of Citizenship. Mr. R now has proof of being a U.S. citizen and never needs to look over his shoulder for ICE again. Result by Mr. Mathur.

Mr. G hired our firm because he was on an H1 visa and was very concerned about a criminal allegation for Felony Injury to a Child. Realizing the severe consequences to Mr. G from a felony charge, the Mathur team went to work to try to stop the case before the Dallas County Grand Jury. Mr. Mathur and Mr. De La Garza ensure that defensive documents were submitted. The Grand Jury convened and "No Billed" or dismissed the case finding no probable cause. Not only does this secure Mr. G from removal and inadmissibility but it also prevents him from the expense of going to Court and defending himself at trial. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. De La Garza.

Ms. Y hired our firm to defend herself against a Theft allegation. Ms. Y was a permanent resident and as such, her status and ability to naturalize was at stake. Mr. Mathur and the team defended her against the Theft case. It was dismissed. Mr. Mathur and the team then expunged her records and later filed for Naturalization. USCIS initially believed they could deny the case. After entering an erroneous denial, Mr. Mathur personally appealed the decision. USCIS reversed their own error and approved the naturalization. Result by Mr. Mathur.

Mr. M was faced with a divorce with a clear claim to spousal support. When Mr. M came to Mr. Mathur and explained the situation, Mr. Mathur quickly advised of the path to avoid the claim. Within a few days of being retained, Mr. Mathur worked together to end the divorce litigation and prevent the spousal support claim from becoming an issue. Results by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Byno.

Ms. D spoke to Mr. Mathur about the money she had lent to her boyfriend. The money had been placed into a home for which she had no title. She was concerned that the home was set to be sold and her ex-boyfriend would flee with her hard-earned money. Mr. Mathur outlined a strategy for Ms. D to be paid. Mr. Johnson contacted the ex-boyfriend and advised that he better pay up or else. An agreement was put in place, and Ms. D was restored her money from the sale proceeds. Results by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Johnson.

Mr. A, an honorably discharged veteran, came to the Mathur Law Offices regarding his wrongful arrest for public intoxication. He had been removed from a commercial flight at DFW airport after a flight attendant mistook his emotional condition (grieving the death of a loved one) for intoxication, and he was subsequently arrested and faced criminal charges. After demanding evidence and proof from the prosecutor, Attorney De La Garza was able to get a dismissal of this case after showing the arrest was improper. Mr. A was then able to petition to remove this arrest from his record so that it would not affect his future career or place a black mark on his many military and professional commendations.

Mr. C's family hired Mathur Law Offices after Mr. C was arrested by ICE. Mr. Mathur reviewed Mr. C's past criminal history and determined he would not be eligible for bond or immigration relief at his future court date. Mr. Mathur immediately recommended that the weapons charge that was preventing relief be lifted if possible. Mr. Mathur filed a Late Motion for New Trial in Panola County, Texas. The District Attorney and Mr. Mathur worked through due process issues related to the issues. The Court GRANTED the Motion for New Trial and a dismissal of the charge was obtained. This clears the path to Mr. C's application for relief before the Immigration Judge. Mr. Mathur accomplished all of this before the first immigration court date.

Ms. C came to visit Mr. Mathur after becoming tired of her husband's ways. According to Ms. C, her husband was drinking, using drugs and visiting places of ill repute. Ms. C had enough. Ms. C wanted to protect herself and get a fresh start. There was over $700,000.00 of debt accumulated during the marriage with very little in the way of assets. Mr. Mathur was able to settle the case with Ms. C walking away without any debt to be paid, maximum child support and spousal support for three (3) years. Ms. C pays none of the debt. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Beuerlein.