At Mathur Law Offices, P.C., our representation is characterized by skill, dedication, and results. Over the years, we have fine-tuned our ability to provide innovative and effective case strategies in a wide-variety of legal practice areas, including immigration, business and civil litigation, family law, and criminal defense. Below, you will find some of our notable and recent case results; a reflection of the high-quality legal service that our team provides for our clients.
To learn more or to see what Mathur Law Offices, P.C. can do for you, call our office today and schedule an initial case consultation.
* NOTE TO THE READER: We also only post the "special victories" as approvals and successes on every case are too voluminous to print. Please call us if you have questions or comments.
Mr. G from Mexico entered the USA without inspection. He later married a U.S. citizen. Mr. G hired Mathur Law Offices to get resident status for him. Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha advised Mr. G to file an immigrant petition and consular process with a provisional waiver. Ms. Sinha guided and helped Mr. G through the process and prepared a substantial provisional waiver. Based on the legal argument and evidence submitted, USCIS granted the provisional waiver. Mr. G's interview for an immigrant visa was scheduled. Ms. Sinha prepared Mr. G for the interview, and the consular officer approved his case. Mr. G is now a permanent resident of the U.S.!
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. P from Mexico entered the USA without inspection when he was a child. He later married a U.S. citizen. Mr. P hired Mathur Law Offices to get resident status for him. Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha advised Mr. P to file an immigrant petition and consular process with a provisional waiver. Ms. Sinha guided and helped Mr. P through the process and prepared a vital provisional waiver. Based on the legal argument and evidence submitted, USCIS granted the waiver. Mr. P received his resident status after his immigrant visa interview at the consulate in Mexico.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. S, a citizen of Nepal, entered the U.S. as a student. He was robbed at gunpoint at a gas station. Based on the incident, he was eligible to file a U-visa available to victims of certain crimes in the U.S. Ms. Sinha worked on gathering evidence and getting certification from police officials for Mr. K's U-visa. Ms. Sinha convincingly prepared Mr. K's U-visa application. As a result, Mr. K's U visa was approved with deferred action by USCIS.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. AT spoke to Mr. Mathur after unsuccessfully trying to get CBP to return a large amount of money seized from him and his family. AT and his family were detained at DFW and prevented from departing the U.S. on their flight. Neither AT nor his family speaks English. CBP demanded that AT and his family declare how much cash they were carrying without counting it first and denied the family an English translator. After counting the cash, CBP relied upon the discrepancy between the family's good-faith estimate and the actual amount to seize the cash. Mr. Zumberg contacted the government and advised of procedural errors in the seizure. The government agreed to return 100% of the money. Results by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Zumberg.
Ms. K, from India, married a United States Citizen in good faith. However, within a few months of marriage, Ms. K's spouse started abusing her, and Ms. K's marriage started falling apart due to spousal abuse and violence. She separated from her spouse and filed a Violence Against Women's Act (VAWA) petition with USCIS. A Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID) was issued by USCIS for lack of evidence to prove abuse. Ms. K then hired Mathur Law Offices. Ms. Sinha worked on collecting and preparing evidence of her husband's misconduct and abuse to respond to USCIS' NOID. Ms. Sinha prepared strong legal arguments to rebut USCIS' NOID. USCIS was convinced by Ms. Sinha's work and response to NOID and approved Ms. K's VAWA petition within a month of receiving the NOID response. Ms. K is now eligible to adjust her status to become a permanent resident of the U.S.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. M was faced with a divorce with a clear claim to spousal support. When Mr. M came to Mr. Mathur and explained the situation, Mr. Mathur quickly advised of the path to avoid the claim. Within a few days of being retained, Mr. Mathur worked together to end the divorce litigation and prevent the spousal support claim from becoming an issue. Results by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Byno.
Ms. D spoke to Mr. Mathur about the money she had lent to her boyfriend. The money had been placed into a home for which she had no title. She was concerned that the home was set to be sold and her ex-boyfriend would flee with her hard-earned money. Mr. Mathur outlined a strategy for Ms. D to be paid. Mr. Johnson contacted the ex-boyfriend and advised that he better pay up or else. An agreement was put in place, and Ms. D was restored her money from the sale proceeds. Results by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Johnson.
Mr. G consulted with the firm about the filing of a protective order against him. Afraid of losing his custody rights and being subject to a protective order, he earnestly needed assistance. In order to prevent the protective order, Mr. Mathur devised a plan to negotiate with the prosecution on the case whilst still moving forward with defenses on a corresponding family law case. Mr. Beuerlein and Ms. Wayne assisted Mr. Mathur with the plan, and the prosecution dismissed the protective order as expected. Results by Mr. Mathur, Mr. Beuerlein, and Ms. Wayne.
Mr. J. who is a resident of the United States was looking at removal and a conviction for Aggravated Assault with Deadly Weapon. Mr. J had a lawyer that was telling to plead guilty and that the deal was the best he could get. Distrusting this advice he consulted with Mr. Mathur. Mr. Mathur took over the case and reviewed the evidence. The case was then set for a Jury trial. As the Jury trial approached, Mr. Mathur advised the prosecutor that most of the evidence they sought to introduce was inadmissible and they would have no case. After receiving the email, the prosecution agreed to dismiss the case with conditions set forth by Mr. Mathur. The case been dismissed with no resulting conviction or immigration consequence. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. De La Garza.
Mr. G from Mexico entered the USA without inspection. He later married a U.S. citizen. Mr. G hired Mathur Law Offices to get resident status for him. Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha advised Mr. G to file an immigrant petition and consular process with a provisional waiver. Ms. Sinha guided and helped Mr. G through the process and prepared a strong provisional waiver. Based on legal argument and evidence submitted, USCIS granted the provisional waiver. Mr. G's interview will now be scheduled at the consulate for grant of permanent resident status in US.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. SinhaMr. J was a legal immigrant on a work visa. He as charged with prostitution. He was very concerned that this charge would lead to public humiliation and inadmissibility from the U.S. Understanding the consequences, the Mathur team spared no effort to work hard on getting the case dismissed without court ordered probation or deferred adjudication. Knowing that any punishment from the Court would lead to a conviction, the Mathur legal team worked to get the case dismissed without court ordered punishment. Ultimately, the case was dismissed and Mr. J was relieved of the concerns he had. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. De La Garza.
Mr. R's family came to see Mr. Mathur when Mr. R was placed in ICE custody for a second time. Mr. R had previously been removed from the United States as an illegal alien. At the time of his prior deportation, Mr. R had another lawyer who failed to spot a critical issue. In 10 minutes of reviewing the case, Mr. Mathur spotted an issue that showed that Mr. R was entitled to seek "derivative" citizenship based on his mother's application and his father's death. Within a few hours of being retained Mr. Mathur was able to have Mr. R released from custody. Within a few months, Mr. Mathur was able to get USCIS to approve his Certificate of Citizenship. Mr. R now has proof of being a U.S. citizen and never needs to look over his shoulder for ICE again. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Ms. E came to our firm with dire concerns. She has been accused of shoplifting. With immigration and reputation concerns, rebutting this allegation was of great consequence. The prosecution had the case video recorded. The prosecutor was keen to prosecute. Yet, with a proactive plan to rebut the prosecutions pre-disposition, the firm was able to get the case dismissed without court ordered punishment! This protects Ms. E's right to expunge the case and have zero effect on her immigration record! Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. De La Garza.
Ms. S came to MLO after suffering physical abuse at the hands of her husband. Mr. Mathur and Mr. Beuerlein successfully obtained an ex parte protective order against Ms. S's spouse and successfully negotiated temporary orders which included approximately $20k in interim attorney fees and temporary support to Ms. S. Thereafter, Ms. S was free of her husband and eventually the case was settled for another large lump sum payment. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Beuerlein.
Ms. R, from Honduras, entered US without inspection and missed court date and was removed in absentia. She later married a United States Citizen. Within a few year of marriage, her spouse started abusing her and Ms. R's marriage started falling apart due to spousal abuse, violence, and adultery. Ms. R came to Mr. Mathur. Mr. Mathur advised Ms. R to seek a divorce and collect evidence in the divorce of the wife’s misconduct and adultery. Mr. Mathur convinced DHS to terminate her removal and filed a Joint Motion to Terminate her in absentia removal. The motion was granted and Ms. R's removal was terminated. Ms. Sinha worked on the case under Mr. Mathur’s supervision and collected all evidence of abuse and finalized the divorce. Ms. Sinha then filed a Violence Against Women’s Act (VAWA) petition as Ms. R was a victim of abuse. USCIS approved Ms. R’s VAWA case. Based on the approved VAWA, Ms. Sinha filed and represented Ms. R on her adjustment of status application at USCIS. USCIS approved Ms. R's application. Ms. R is now a permanent resident of US.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.Mr. L from Mexico entered the USA without inspection. He later married a U.S. citizen. Mr. L hired Mathur Law Offices to get resident status for him. Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha advised Mr. L to file an immigrant petition and consular process with a provisional waiver. Ms. Sinha guided and helped Mr. L through the process and prepared a strong provisional waiver. Based on legal argument and evidence submitted, USCIS granted the provisional waiver. Mr. L is scheduled for his interview at the consulate in Mexico to receive resident status.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Ms. S was an existing family law client. Ms. S filed for a divorce against her husband. Her husband recorded Ms. S disciplining his child, Ms. S' step-child. The husband also sent emails and pictures to the police. The police investigated the case and stated, there was sufficient evidence to present the case to the Grand Jury. Mr. Mathur was called into assist on the case. Mr. Mathur prepared evidence of the husband's motive to lie and fabricate evidence. Mr. Mathur also prepared documents to show that Ms. S' husband was not a truthful man. After conferring with the District Attorney's Office, the matter was dropped and not presented to the Grand Jury. Result by Mr. Mathur!
Mr. K, a citizen of Nepal entered US as a student. He was robbed at gun point at a gas station. Based on the incidence, he was eligible to file U-visa that is available to victims of certain crime in US. Ms. Sinha worked on gathering evidence and getting certification from police officials for Mr. K’s U-visa. Ms. Sinha convincingly prepared Mr. K’s U-visa application. Mr. K’s work authorization and U visa was approved by USCIS. When Mr. K became eligible to become a permanent resident of US, Ms. Sinha represented Mr. K on his resident status application. Based on the evidence submitted and convincing arguments by Ms. Sinha, USCIS approved Mr. K's application. Mr. K is now a permanent resident of US. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. Y hired MLO after his employer stopped paying him monies owed to him for work done on behalf of the company. Mr. Y was owed over $230,000.00 from his employer. Mr. Beuerlein demanded payment from the employer and then filed suit against the employer after the employer ignored the demand. Mr. Beuerlein thereafter negotiated a settlement and the Court entered an agreed judgment against the employer in the amount of $250,000.00 which included 100% of the principal balance owed to Mr. Y plus his attorney’s fees. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Beuerlein.
Mr. MA's family hired Mathur Law Offices after he was detained without bond by ICE. Mr. Cho liaised with the family and gathered the necessary evidence in support of Mr. MA's bond application. Mr. Zumberg represented Mr. MA at the hearing and secured $10,000 bond despite a pending criminal charge, and multiple convictions for DWI and other criminal offenses. Result by Mr. Zumberg, Mr. Mathur, and Mr. Cho.
Mr. B came to Mr. Mathur for assistance with a years’ old criminal conviction for drug trafficking. After many years of being in the United States and building a successful chain of Mexican restaurants, Mr. B was haunted by the fact that he could never fix his immigration status and was subject to immediate deportation. Despite the case originating out of Austin, Texas, Mr. B wanted the Mathur Law Offices, to work on his matter. After being pending and being denied by the Court of Appeals, Mr. Mathur began communication with the prosecution. After several months of review and exchanges, the prosecution was finally convinced that the conviction was unjust. As such, Mr. Mathur and the prosecution agreed to remand the case from the Court of Appeals to the trial court and ultimately reverse and dismiss the conviction. After over seventeen years of fear, Mr. B is now able to fix his immigration status. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Ms. P was a client of our firm on a separate matter when she was sued in civil court. The plaintiff alleged severe injuries as a result of an automobile accident. There was a criminal case that had been related to the event. The plaintiff's counsel set the case for trial. Prior to the trial, Mr. Mathur and Mr. Reese pointed out that the plaintiff had failed to prove their case. Their medical records and related damages had not been made ready for trial. Based on the lack of admissible evidence, Mr. Reese attended mediation and settled the case for only $1000.00. This was done to wrap the case up and avoid additional legal fees related to trial. Result by Mr. Reese and Mr. Mathur.
Ms. C had enough of her husband's abusive behavior. With constant drinking and drug abuse, she could take no more. With all she had in mind, Ms. C had to protect her kids and get out of the home. She hired Mr. Mathur ahead to file for divorce. Mr. Mathur gathered evidence and sought a restraining order, which was granted. Ms. C's husband was served and ordered to take drug tests. When the hearing was about to begin, Ms. C and his lawyer did not want to face the evidence gathered, they agree to terms of support, child support, expenses, private school tuition, drug screening and other aspects that resolved Ms. C's immediate concerns. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Beuerlein.
Ms. S hired Mathur Law Offices to assist her with her divorce case. Married with an eighteen-month old child, her husband had abandoned her and her child. Mr. Beuerlein obtained a trial setting and sought a Judgment against the husband. At the last minute, Ms. S's husband hired a lawyer and tried to contest issues at trial. Mr Beuerlein objected on the delay and technical ground to the last-minute appearance. The Judge granted all custody and divorce issues in favor of Ms. S. Result by Mr. Beuerlein and Mr. Mathur.
Mr. W came to see Mr. Mathur and was referred by a trusted friend. Mr. W was accused of assaulting a fellow tenant of his apartment complex. After reviewing the case, Mr. Mathur ordered the subpoena of the surveillance tapes. The tapes showed that Mr. W was innocent and on the day of trial the case was dismissed! Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. De La Garza.
Mr. RA hired Mathur Law Offices in 2012 after losing TPS and being placed in removal proceedings. Mr. RA grew up in El Salvador but believed that he was a U.S. Citizen by birth. Mr. Mathur defended the case based on Mr. RA's citizenship claim, resulting in the case being administratively closed by ICE. Mr. RA's case was unilaterally reopened in 2017 due to the Trump Administration’s new immigration enforcement policies. Mr. Zumberg researched Mr. RA’s claim and counseled his family on gathering the necessary evidence to prove his citizenship. Ultimately, an agreement was made to dismiss the removal case.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Zumberg.
Mr. P was facing a prostitution charge. The humiliation of such a charge, his reputation, his marriage and his immigration status was at stake. The prosecutor refused to dismiss the case. Mr. P requested that Mr. Mathur take over the file. Mr. Mathur took over the file and within a week secured a dismissal agreement. Result by Mr. Mathur.
CR retained Mathur Law Offices after being detained by ICE. CR was ineligible for relief due to his multiple DWI convictions. Mr. Mathur vacated CR's most recent DWI conviction on constitutional grounds, restoring his eligibility for EOIR-42B Cancellation of Removal for Certain Nonpermanent Residents. Despite this change, the Immigration Judge found CR ineligible for relief and summarily ordered him removed.
Mr. Zumberg appealed the removal order to the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA"), who reversed the Immigration Judge and ordered the case to proceed to trial. Mr. Zumberg than applied for bond of behalf of CR, which the Immigration Judge again denied. Mr. Zumberg appealed again to the BIA, which unfortunately also denied the bond application.
Due to his continued detention, CR was scheduled for an expedited trial. Mrs. Lopez worked with his family and friends to gather as much evidence as possible to rehabilitate CR's character - evidence which the Immigration Judge later acknowledged influenced his decision. Mr. Zumberg represented CR at trial and strongly argued for relief. CR won his case and received his resident status! Result by Mr. Mathur, Mr. Zumberg, and Mrs. Lopez.
Mr. H came to Mathur Law Offices after years of being a refugee. Concerned about his past and history from Afghanistan, Mr. H wanted the best representation. After reviewing and filing his case, the Mathur team worked diligently on getting his case and approved and his status resolved. After 17 years of waiting, Mr. H finally became a resident. Result by Mr. Zumberg and Mr. Mathur.
Mr. JS' family retained Mathur Law Offices after being unsatisfied with the services of a former immigration attorney. Within 24 hours of being retained, Mr. Zumberg filed a bond application with the Dallas Immigration Court. Mrs. Erika Lopez ably worked with Mr. JS and his family to secure the required evidence and present the best possible offer of proof. Mr. Zumberg represented Mr. JS at the hearing and secured a $3,000 bond despite Mr. JS having arrests in multiple states, a theft conviction, and a pending drug possession case on his criminal record. Result by Mr. Zumberg and Mrs. Erika Lopez.
Mr. C was referred by his immigration lawyer to Mathur Law Offices. Due to his criminal history, Mr. C's lawyer was unable to apply for bail or relief. Mr. C had two prior criminal cases and one pending case. Mr. Mathur worked with to assist Mr. C's lawyer by file motions to remove one of the criminal convictions changing the nature of the charge of the other. After a few weeks or intensive work, Mr. Mathur was able to remove one the criminal conviction causing issues with the immigration case and get the case dismissed! Mr. Mathur also changed the plea agreement on the pending case so no immigration consequence would occur. Mr. C's lawyer was thereafter able to apply for immigration bail and Mr. C has been released! Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mr. K was detained by ICE following an arrest related to a DWI conviction from Denton County. Mr. Mathur reviewed the case and determined the client was not removable under the circumstances. Mr. Mathur directed Mr. Zumberg to communicate with ICE to terminate the removal proceedings. After completion of said correspondence and review, ICE agreed and released Mr. K.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Zumberg.
Ms. L came to Mathur Law Offices, when she was charged with Theft. After review of the case an evidence, the firm developed a strategy for dismissal. Mr. De La Garza appeared in Court and convinced the prosecution the case should be dismissed. The case dismissed on the first court date! Result by Mr. De La Garza.
Mrs. B retained Mathur Law Offices after being placed in removal proceedings for three separate crimes. Mr. Mathur convinced the Court to expedite Mrs. B's hearing due to her suffering from numerous medical conditions. As a result, Mrs. B's trial was scheduled to proceed within 2 weeks. Mr. Zumberg and Mr. Mathur worked with the Department of Homeland Security to reach an agreement prior to trial. Mr. Zumberg represented Mrs. B at trial, and the Judge granted Mrs. B Cancellation of Removal. Result by Mr. Zumberg, Mr. Mathur, and Mrs. Lopez.
Ms. J hired the Mathur team after being charged with Theft. Concerned about his employment, further employment opportunities, reputation in the community and immigration status, the theft case had dire consequences. The Mathur team worked hard to secure a dismissal of the criminal case. This occurred by agreement. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. De La Garza.
Mr. A hired Mr. Mathur when he was arrested on DWI felony probation revocation. Mr. Mathur filed a motion for bond and convinced the court to allow Mr. A out of jail. Mr. A was released. Mr. Mathur specifically instructed the client on all items he needed to complete to convince the Judge and the ADA not to violate him and put him in prison. After months of following Mr. Mathur's instructions, the Mathur team was able to convince the Court to deny the violations, not send Mr. A to prison and reinstate his probation! Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mr. H came to our firm when they ran into issues with being unable to naturalize due to a learning disability. Without knowing the civics portion of naturalization and being handicapped to answer questions, naturalization is normally an obstacle. After lengthy preparation, Ms. Sinha, under Mr. Mathur's instruction applied for a medical waiver. The waiver was approved and Ms. H was able to become a U.S. citizen! Result by Ms. Sinha and Mr. Mathur.
Based on Mr. Mathur’s reputation, Ms. N retained Mathur Law Offices after being unable to fix her immigration status for over 10 years. USCIS traumatized Ms. N by issuing her a green card and later physically seizing it. Ms. N’s husband tragically passed away before the matter could be resolved. After reconciling the case’s convoluted decade-plus history of denials, appeals, and applications, Mr. Zumberg quickly moved to preserve Ms. N’s ability to immigrate. Mr. Zumberg prepared and represented Ms. N at the interview, resulting in the agency finally granting her lawful permanent residency. Result by Mr. Zumberg.
Mr. P retained Mathur Law Offices after he was charged with domestic assault. As a result of the charge, Mr. P was unable to timely renew his H-1B visa, jeopardizing his employment and a multimillion dollar project that he was supervising. Mr. Zumberg advised on the technical immigration issues arising from the criminal charge. As a result of this comprehensive defense strategy, the prosecutor dismissed Mr. P's assault charge before pre-trial. Result by Mr. Zumberg and Mr. Mathur.
Mr. Mathur was asked to handle Ms. S's case himself due to the serious nature of the case. Ms. S had been charged with sexual indecency with a minor and pleaded guilty to this crime. The result of which would be certain removal. Mr. Mathur handled the case in immigration court and purposely took an appeal. After the appeal was pending Mr. Mathur fought the case in the criminal court and was able to get the plea withdrawn based on the inherent defective and unfair nature of the accusation in the first place. Once the plea was withdrawn, Mr. Mathur moved to dismiss/terminate the removal case. The Immigration Judge reluctantly granted this as he had no other choice. Mr. Mathur then requested that Ms. S's naturalization be filed. Mr. Inofomoh prepared the naturalization under Mr. Mathur's strict guidance and instructions. On interview, the naturalization was granted and Ms. S is now a U.S. citizen who was once Ordered Removed. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Inofomoh.
Ms. M hired MLO after she discovered her husband was being unfaithful. Ms. S filed for divorce with the help of MLO. After the Court entered temporary orders allowing the husband to have standard possession of the children, Ms. M discovered that he was abusing drugs in the presence of the children. With the help of Mr. Beuerlein, and after a contested hearing, Ms. M obtained a temporary restraining order against her husband and the Court ordered that he have supervised access to the children. Mr. Beuerlein was able to settle the case at mediation pursuant to an agreement imposing certain safeguards and injunctions against her husband including random drug tests. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Beuerlein.
Ms. T came to see Mr. Mathur as she had been a past client on a family matter. Now, Ms. T had been arrested and accused of family violence and burglary of a habitation. Since burglary is a felony and since Ms. T hired Mr. Mathur right away, Mr. Mathur was able to defend Ms. T in front of the Dallas County Grand Jury. The Grand Jury dismissed Ms. T's case, resulting in no court and eligibility to expunge her records. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mr. D hired Mathur Law Offices when the mother of the child put him on child support without proof of paternity. Ms. Sinha worked on the case under Mr. Mathur's supervision. Ms. Sinha successfully argues the case in court with evidence to terminate the child support order and dismiss the SACPR case. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha
Mr. C's family came to see Mr. Mathur when he was arrested and placed in removal. Mr. C's had children who were citizens and on DACA. Mr. C was ineligible to stay based on a DWI conviction that imposed a tough sentence. Mr. Mathur filed a Motion for New Trial and was able to get the criminal plea reversed. The Immigration Judge then denied relief stating that the Motion for New Trial did not matter. Mr. Mathur and Mr. Zumberg appealed and had the immigration reversed by the Board of Immigration Appeals, allowing Mr. C to file his application to stay! Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Zumberg.
Mr. J has been a long time client of Mathur Law Offices. Initially, Mr. J came to the firm for DACA. Later, Mr. J got married and wanted to legalize. Mr. J's case was converted from a petition through his spouse, a waiver of inadmissibility and consular processing. After years of being a client, Mr. J's case was approved and he re-entered the U.S. legally as a lawful permanent resident! Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. S was stuck in the Denton County Jail with pending sexual felony charges. Mr. S' lawyer did not know how to get Mr. S released from jail with an ICE hold. Mr. S' family hired the Mathur team. Mr. Mathur advised Mr. S and his lawyer how to handle the situation. Shortly after Mr. Mathur's plan was executed, Mr. S was released from criminal and immigration custody. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Zumberg.
Ms. S from Mexico entered the USA without inspection when she was a child. She later married a U.S. citizen. Ms. S hired Mathur Law Offices to get resident status for her. Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha advised Ms. S to file an immigrant petition and consular process with a provisional waiver. Ms. Sinha guided and helped Ms. S through the process and prepared a strong provisional waiver. Based on legal argument and evidence submitted USCIS granted the waiver. Ms. S received her resident status after his immigrant visa interview at the consulate in Mexico.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
OAG was threatening to file suit over price gouging during Hurricane Harvey. OAG stated that client's gas station was in the top three stations for complaints in the state. Case was being personally overseen by the Attorney General. Settled for restitution plus 25% penalty. OAG credited our response and timely production of documents resulting in the relatively low settlement amount. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Howery.
Ms. A hired Mathur Law Offices after being served with a divorce petition filed by her husband wherein he sought primary custody of their minor child and temporary orders from the Court. Ms. A was concerned about her financial situation and her husband fighting for custody of their child. Mr. Beuerlein was able to get the opposing attorney to agree to postpone discovery and to attend an informal settlement conference. At the conference Mr. Beuerlein successfully negotiated a final settlement wherein Ms. A was appointed the primary conservator and a disproportionate share of the marital estate. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Beuerlein.
Mr. S and his family came to Mathur Law Offices after their appeal was denied by the Board of Immigration Appeals. Mr. Zumberg immediately moved the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for a judicial stay of removal, and extensively briefed the legal issues. After reviewing Mr. Zumberg's brief, the U.S. Department of Justice conceded the motion and noticed the court that the government would not oppose staying the removal of Mr. S and his family. Result by Mr. Zumberg and Mr. Mathur.
Defendant was referred to firm by AH. Plaintiff was seeking "monetary relief over $100,000 but not more than $200,000" per Petition. Plaintiff agreed to a settlement of $800.00 for full release. Result by Mr. Howery.
Mr. H was referred to Mr. Mathur by a fellow criminal lawyer. Mr. Mathur provided advice to the criminal lawyer on how to get the client released and transferred to ICE. Mr. Mathur reviewed the client's background and requested that ICE set a bond without a hearing before a Judge. The request was granted and the client was released upon payment of a bond with ICE. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mr. W's father hired Mr. Mathur after extensive research on his who the right lawyer would be for his son. Mr. W had previously been represented by a court appointed lawyer. As a result, there were many unfair terms and conditions of probation. Mr. W was now accused of violating some of these provisions. Mr. Mathur moved for bond and release, which was granted. Mr. Mathur then advised the Probation Officer and Court as to how Mr. W could comply and terms could be amended. A plan was put together and Mr. W complied. As a result, the probation was reinstated and Mr. Mathur avoided a long prison sentence. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Vrechek.
Mr. H and his ex-wife were divorced in Colorado. Mr. H was ordered to pay child support and his wife was appointed primary conservator of their 6 children, 4 minors, 2 of which were adopted and have special needs. She later moved to Texas with the children. Mr. H moved to Texas as well and shortly thereafter, his ex-wife relinquished possession of the 4 minor children to Mr. H. Mr. Beuerlein registered the out-of-state order in Texas and then sought to modify child support and custody. At a temporary order hearing, the Court appointed Mr. H the temporary primary conservator of the minor children and ordered his ex-wife to pay child support. She was also ordered to turn over the state subsidy she was receiving for the 2 special needs children. Subsequently, Mr. Beuerlein negotiated with the ex-wife and settled the case based on the terms of the temporary orders. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Beuerlein.!
Ms. R came to Mathur Law Offices 6 years ago, after escaping the clutches of an abusive ex-husband. Unfortunately, Ms. R's case suffered setbacks at trial and on appeal. Undeterred, Ms. Sinha successfully petitioned the Department of Homeland Security for a Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) visa, which is available to certain undocumented victims of domestic violence. Mr. Zumberg then briefed the issue to the Department of Homeland Security's Deputy Chief Counsel, and persuaded the agency to jointly move to reopen and terminate Ms. R's case. The Board of Immigration Appeals approved the motion, and rescinded Ms. R's removal order. Ms. R is now free to pursue her green card through adjustment of status, and has a bright future ahead of her. Result by Mr. Mathur, Ms. Sinha and Mr. Zumberg.
Mr. T hired our firm after his home was raided and over $130,000 was seized by the Department of Homeland Security. Mr. T was threatened with criminal charges related to the alleged sale of synthetic marijuana. Mr. Mathur and his team provided extensive research related to the substances not being illegal under the law. No criminal charges were filed. Mr. T then authorized Mr. Mathur and his team to retrieve the money seized. After many months of work on the case, Mr. T's money was returned. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Inofomoh.
Mr. T retained Mathur Law Offices after being detained by U.S. Customs and Border Protection when he attempted to reenter the country on his green card. Mr. Mathur successfully argued that Mr. T was eligible for a standalone waiver under INA Section 212(h) to fix his immigration status. After Mr. T's case was delayed due to backlogs with trial dates, Mr. Zumberg moved the court to advance Mr. T's hearing to prevent further prejudice to Mr. T and his family. The court approved the motion, saving Mr. T 2 years of waiting time. Mr. Zumberg prepared the case and represented Mr. T at trial, resulting in the Court granting Mr. T the waiver. Mr. T is now able to pursue naturalization. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Zumberg.
Mr. W hired our firm to petition for his wife. Ms. W's wife entered the United States illegally and therefore, was barred to return legally. Under Mr. Mathur's supervision, Ms. Sinha analyzed the case and reviewed the history. After preparation of the visa petition, a waiver was applied for to waive all illegal presence and pre-approve entry. The waiver was approved and our client is able to obtain her legal status. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. K was unduly denied for his family based visa petition based on a past filing. Mr. Mathur and Mr. Zumberg file with the U.S. Court of Appeals to have the case heard as an abuse of due process. The U.S. Department of Justice filed a Motion to Dismiss Mr. K’s case. Attorney Michael Zumberg drafted a response and brief opposing dismissal. A panel of 5th Circuit Judges ruled in favor of Firm's client, upholding jurisdiction. Results by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Zumberg.
Mr. J, from Nepal, entered US on a visa and married a United States Citizen. Within a few year of marriage, his spouse started abusing him and Mr. J’s marriage started falling apart due to spousal abuse, violence, and adultery. Mr. J came to Mathur Law Offices and Ms. Sinha advised Mr. J to seek a divorce and collect evidence in the divorce of the wife’s misconduct and adultery. Ms. Sinha worked on the divorce and VAWA case under Mr. Mathur’s supervision and collected all evidence of abuse. The divorce was granted. Mr. J was a victim of abuse and filed a Violence Against Women’s Act (VAWA) petition. USCIS approved Mr. J’s Mr. J will be filing his adjustment of status application to become a permanent resident of US. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Ms. K's family hired our firm after she was arrested for Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon. The allegations was that was Ms. K used a knife in a domestic argument with her husband. After reviewing the case, Mr. Mathur and his team put together a strong factual argument that there was no such Assault. Mr. Mathur prepared a written argument to the Grand Jury. After reviewing the case, the Grand Jury "No Billed" the case finding no probable cause to proceed with the felony charges. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mr. E hired the Mathur team when he was accused of sexual assault. Mr. E's company sued the alleged victim as she had taken customers of Mr. E. The alleged victim sued back alleging that she was a victim of sexual assault, intentional infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment and required damages and exemplary damages. Based on a motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of Mr. E, the court found no evidence of these claims and dismissed the alleged victims claims. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Beuerlein.
Ms. S, a citizen of India, filed a Form I-751 petition to remove the conditions on her status as a Lawful Permanent Resident. She immigrated through good-faith marriage, but that marriage did not work out. Ms. Sinha advised on filing for divorce and removal of conditions with waiver. Ms. Sinha then filed for removal of conditions application with all pertinent documents requesting waiver for Ms. S. Ms. Sinha worked on preparing a strong case with evidence of bona fide marriage. Based on the evidence submitted, USCIS approved Ms. S’s application. Ms. S is now permanent residents of US and are also eligible to become a US citizen. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Ms. M was arrested by the Frisco Police Department for Class Assault Family Violence. Mr. Mathur and his team went to work collecting evidence that Ms. M was being mis-characterized and that the case should not be filed. Mr. Mathur and the team forwarded their arguments and documents to the District Attorney. The District Attorney refused the case! Result by Mr. Mathur.
Ms. M hired MLO after she had been physically abused at the hands of her husband. Mr. Beuerlein sought a temporary restraining order and temporary support for Ms. M. With the overwhelming evidence against the husband Mr. Beuerlein obtained an agreed order restraining husband for being near client and ordering husband to pay temporary support in the amount of $1,500.00 per month. Thereafter Mr. Beuerlein settled the case in mediation with a disproportionate share of the estate going to Ms. M on the basis of the physical abuse she suffered at the hands of her husband and having been forced to move out of state to get away from him. Result by Mr. Beuerlein and Mr. Mathur.
Mr. L hired our firm when he was being investigated by the Richardson Police Department. The Mathur team put together legal arguments that the client could not be indicted (sent to court on a felony). The Grand Jury agreed and "no billed" the case. This results in a dismissal for Mr. L!
Results by Mr. Mathur and criminal defense team!
Mr. L hired the Mathur team to defend him against a protective order request. The team prepared a defense to the case and the hearing was held. The protective order request was denied! Mr. L wins his case. Result by Ms. Sinha and Mr. Howery.
Mr. O from Mexico hired Mathur Law Offices to work on her petition and provisional waiver. Mr. O had entered the USA without inspection in 1993 and later married a U.S. citizen. Ms. Sinha worked on Mr. O's case to prepare a strong provisional waiver application with legal arguments. USCIS reviewed the case and arguments from Ms. Sinha and approved Mr. O's waiver.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. L was detained by ICE after being convicted of multiple felonies. Despite his significant criminal history, Mr. Zumberg was able to put together a strong argument for bond based on Mr. L's multiple forms of relief, including unique relief available to Cuban Citizens. After a contested hearing, the Court agreed with Mr. Zumberg and granted $7,500 bond. Result by Mr. Zumberg, Mr. Mathur, and Ms. Lopez.
Mr. M from hired Mathur Law Offices to work on his provisional waiver that was denied by USCIS. Mr. M Mexico had entered the USA without inspection in 1997 as a child and later married a U.S. citizen. Ms. Sinha worked on Mr. M's case to prepare a strong provisional waiver application with legal arguments to reconsider Mr. M's case. USCIS reviewed the case and arguments from Ms. Sinha and approved the waiver. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. T was arrested near San Antonio on an alleged DWI. ICE placed an immigration detainer on him and transferred him to federal custody after he posted his DWI bond. At a contested hearing, ICE alleged that in addition to a previous conviction, Mr. T committed fraud. Despite Mr. T's criminal history and the serious nature of ICE's allegations, Mr. Zumberg convinced the judge to grant $8,000 bond. Result by Mr. Zumberg and Ms. Lopez.
Mr. J from Mexico entered the USA without inspection in 2000 and later married a naturalized U.S. citizen. Mr. J hired Mathur Law Offices to get resident status for him. Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha advised Mr. J to file an immigrant petition and consular process with a provisional waiver. Ms. Sinha guided and helped Mr. J through the process and prepared a strong provisional waiver. Based on legal argument and evidence submitted USCIS granted the waiver. Mr. J will receive his resident status after his immigrant visa interview at the consulate in Mexico.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.Ms. J hired Mr. Mathur when she was placed in removal proceedings after the asylum case was denied. Mr. Mathur initially argued that her asylum case should be approved. However, over the passage of time, Ms. J married a U.S. citizen. Mr. Mathur then advised the court that the case would be pursued through marriage versus asylum. The government did not agree to dismiss the case as they suspected that the marriage was for convenience. Mr. Mathur proved that the marriage was genuine and that the case should be approved. Finally, the immigration judge agreed and granted Ms. J her residency. Result by Mr. Mathur, Mr. Zumberg and Ms. Sinha.
Ms. H from Mexico hired Mathur Law Offices to work on her petition and provisional waiver. Ms. H had entered the USA without inspection in 1993 as a child and later married a U.S. citizen. Ms. Sinha worked on Ms. H's case to prepare a strong provisional waiver application with legal arguments. USCIS reviewed the case and arguments from Ms. Sinha and approved Ms. H's waiver.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. H hired our firm after his mother in law and brother in law accused him of assaulting them when exchanging his daughter. Mr. H's wife also joined in on the allegations stating that Mr. H had previously choked her. A divorce was filed. Mr. Mathur went to trial on the temporary orders and discredited the allegations. No family violence was found and Mr. H won 50/50 custody of his daughter. Later Mr. Mathur appeared in the criminal cases and after a long term negotiation with the prosecution, Mr. Mathur convinced them that if they pushed forward to trial, the cases would be tried and won by the defense. The prosecution agreed to dismissals of all cases against Mr. H including the felony charge. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mr. M, from India, entered US on a visa and married a United States Citizen. Within a few year of marriage, his spouse started abusing him and Mr. M’s marriage started falling apart due to spousal abuse, violence, and adultery. Mr. M came to Mr. Mathur. Mr. Mathur advised Mr. M to seek a divorce and collect evidence in the divorce of the wife’s misconduct and adultery. Ms. Sinha worked on the case under Mr. Mathur’s supervision and collected all evidence of abuse. The divorce was granted. Mr. M was a victim of abuse and filed a Violence Against Women’s Act (VAWA) petition. USCIS approved Mr. M’s VAWA case. Mr. M is now eligible to file his adjustment of status application to become a permanent resident of US.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. S hired MLO after he and his spouse got into an alleged altercation at their home. His spouse pursued criminal assault family violence charges against him and sought a protective order and supervised visitations in addition to filing a divorce case. Mr. Beuerlein convinced the opposing counsel that there was no basis for the protective order pursuant to the Texas Family Code. As a result, opposing counsel dismissed the protective order case against Mr. S. Mr. Beuerlein then proceeded to successfully negotiate a final settlement for Mr. S wherein he would be appointed a joint managing conservator and have the right to possession of his young child. Result by Mr. Beuerlein and Mr. Mathur.
Ms. B, from Mexico was a victim of abuse in US. Ms. Sinha worked under Mr. Mathur's supervision to file a case with convincing evidence and arguments. USCIS approved Ms. B's Violence Against Women's Act case. After the approval of VAWA, Ms. Sinha filed Ms. B's adjustment of status application and represented her at USCIS interview. Ms. B. was granted resident status. Ms. B became eligible to apply for naturalization. Ms. Sinha prepared her naturalization case and represented Ms. B. USCIS approved Ms. B's naturalization case. Ms. B is a naturalized US citizen!
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. P was a previous client of the Mathur firm. Mr. P was charged with DWI with a child passenger. Knowing that this offense would most likely result in deportation and lack of availability of relief before the Immigration Judge, Mr. Mathur worked to reduce this charge to a misdemeanor with no child passenger. Sure enough, Mr. P was put in removal proceedings. Since Mr. Mathur protected the record on the lowering of previous criminal charge, Mr. Mathur was able to argue that relief was available through cancellation of removal and that the client had rehabilitated and was eligible for bond. The trial court granted a $4000.00 immigration bond. Result by Mr. Mathur, Mr. Zumberg and Ms. Lopez.
Ms. L hired Mr. Mathur when her family advised that a warrant had been issued for a probation revocation. She was in jail and there was no bail. Mr. Mathur and the team of lawyers at the firm went to work right away. Mr. L was granted bail. Additionally, she returned to court and the Mathur Team showed the court that there were no just causes to revoke Ms. Lee and that it was in the interest of justice to reinstate her probation. The court agreed and Ms. L's probation was reinstated. Result by Mr. Mathur and the criminal defense team!
Mr. B hired Mathur Law Offices due to his concern about fraud allegations. Mr. B had been judicially found to have committed fraud by a U.S. Court. That judgment would be apparent on his application and Mr. B need a good lawyer to advise him how to get his naturalization application approved. The Mathur team argued that this allegation was not amount to a violation of Mr. B's character and not a basis to deny naturalization. The application was approved! Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Inofomoh.
Mr. T's family was referred to the Mathur team after he was arrested for possession of controlled substances, a felony. Mr. Mathur reviewed Mr. T's case and filed a motion to reduce the bail. Mr. T had an ICE hold on him to be sent to removal. His family could not pay $15,000.00 in cash and the bail bondsmen refused to work with Mr. T's family. Mr. Mathur brought the case to court and had the criminal bail reduced to only $1,500.00, resulting in Mr. T's release from criminal custody. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Ms. N hired MLO to help her with a divorce from her current spouse who had abandoned her and left for India. Despite, the spouse's complete and utter refusal to cooperate or participate in the Texas case, Mr. Beuerlein was able to set the case for trial and a judgment in favor of Ms. S with a favorable distribution of the parties assets. Result by Mr. Beuerlein and Mr. Mathur.
Dr. D came to our firm after one of her businesses was sued by her former husband. Her husband, a lawyer, filed suit against one of her legally formed entities claiming he was owed money. Based on the allegations, the firm conducted discovery, found his claims to be illegitimate and filed a motion for summary judgment. The other side backed off their case completely and dismissed their own case. Result by Mr. Mathur, Mr. Beuerlien and Ms. Jones.
Mr. L hired MLO to file for divorce against his spouse. In retaliation to being served with the divorce case, his spouse filed a baseless affidavit and request for protective order against him. Mr. Beuerlein was able to effectively argue that there was no basis for the protective order and that there was no evidence of family violence that could be produced in support thereof. Mr. Beuerlein then sought the spouse's deposition and shortly thereafter, the spouse dismissed the protective order case against Mr. L. Result by Mr. Beuerlein and Mr. Mathur.
Ms. B hired Mathur Law Offices for an Appeal and Motion to Reopen when her application for Adjustment of Status was denied and she was out of status. Ms. Sinha prepared and filed a Motion to Reopen with strong argument and evidence. USCIS granted the motion and reopened the case. Ms. B's Adjustment of Status case has been reopened and she is now eligible to become a permanent resident. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Ms. M was arrested and transferred to immigration where she was held without bond. Mr. Mathur and Mr. Zumberg prepared extensive documentation showing that Ms. M was not a flight risk or danger to society. In addition, evidence was gathered as to Ms. M's relief from removal proceedings. The Immigration Judge GRANTED bond and Ms. M was released. Result by Mr. Zumberg and Mr. Mathur.
Ms. M, an undocumented person, was arrested after being accused of shoplifting. After being transferred to ICE, the officials refused to grant bond. Mr. Mathur and his team went to work collecting evidence of Ms. E's long history in the U.S. and filing a bond application. While DHS was unwilling to allow a bond, Mr. Zumberg won the hearing and the Court granted bond to Ms. E. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Zumberg.
Mr. M hired the Mathur team when he was arrested for DWI. Mr. Zumberg advised the family on how to get the ICE hold executed so that he could apply for an administrative immigration bond. The family did their part and Mr. Zumberg communicated with ICE and persuaded ICE officials to release Mr. M on a very low immigration bond. The case was not completed in a just a few days and Mr. M was released from custody!
Mr. A came to seek Mr. Mathur's aid when he was charged with domestic violence assault. Mr. Mathur suggested a interview with the victim and a statement from the alleged victim. This was forwarded to the prosecution. The prosecution later reviewed this material and declined to take charges against Mr. A. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Garcia.
Mr. H from hired Mathur Law Offices to work on his provisional waiver that was denied by USCIS. Mr. H Mexico had entered the USA without inspection in 1993 as a child and later married a U.S. citizen. Ms. Sinha worked on Mr. H's case to prepare a strong provisional waiver application with legal arguments to reconsider Mr. H's case. USCIS reviewed the case and arguments from Ms. Sinha and approved the waiver. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. M from Mexico entered the USA without inspection in 2000 and later married a naturalized U.S. citizen. Mr. M hired Mathur Law Offices to get resident status for him. Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha advised Mr. M to file an immigrant petition and consular process with a provisional waiver. Ms. Sinha guided and helped Mr. M through the process and prepared a strong provisional waiver. Based on legal argument and evidence submitted USCIS granted the waiver. Mr. was scheduled his immigrant visa interview at the consulate in Mexico and granted resident status. He united with his family in US and is permanent resident. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. R came to Mathur Law Offices after being charged with his second DWI. At stake was Mr. R’s commercial driver’s license. Mr. Mathur filed a Motion to Suppress evidence that was illegally obtained. The Judge granted portions of the motion and declared some of the evidence illegally obtained and inadmissible. Prior to trial, Mr. Mathur worked out a dismissal of the DWI case. This saved Mr. R’s commercial driver’s license. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Ms. D, a citizen of Peru, filed a Form I-751 petition to remove the conditions on her status as a Lawful Permanent Resident. She immigrated through good-faith marriage, but that marriage did not work out. Ms. Sinha advised on filing for divorce and removal of conditions with waiver. Ms. Sinha finalized Ms. D’s divorce. Ms. Sinha then filed for removal of conditions application with all pertinent documents requesting waiver for Ms. D. Ms. Sinha worked on preparing a strong case with evidence of bona fide marriage. Based on the evidence submitted, USCIS approved Ms. D’s application. Ms. D is now permanent residents of US and are also eligible to become a US citizen. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. T discovered his son's mother was being abused by her live-in boyfriend in front of the child. The mother attempted to deny abuse occurred and has refused to seek any help from proper authorities. Mr. Beuerlein was successful in obtaining an ex parte temporary restraining order restricting the mother's access to supervised visitations. After a contested hearing on temporary orders where the mother acted indifferent to the abuse, the Court granted all relief sought by Mr. T including temporary child support; appointing Mr. T sole managing conservator; restricting the mother's access; ordering supervised visitation; and enjoining the mother from allowing the child to be near the abusive boyfriend. Result by Mr. Beuerlein.
Mr. S from Nepal married a naturalized U.S. citizen and filed for his adjustment of status. Due to inadmissibility based on a criminal issue, Mr. S needed a waiver based on hardship to his US citizen spouse. Ms. Sinha guided and helped Mr. S through the process and prepared a strong waiver of hardship. Based on the hardship waiver submitted, Mr. S' case was approved. He is now eligible to become a permanent resident of US and stay in US with his spouse and child.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. N consulted with Mathur Law Offices and hired to file for Adoption of a Child from India living in US. Ms. Sinha under Mr. Mathur's supervision prepared and filed the case and required evidence. Ms. Sinha represented Mr. N and his wife in the court and the adoption was granted.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Ms. G from Mexico hired Mathur Law Offices when she was US without status. Ms. Sinha reviewed and research the information to determine that Ms. G would derive citizenship. Ms. Sinha under Mr. Mathur's supervision worked on the case and filed the application with legal argument. Ms. Sinha represented Ms. G at the interview and convinced USCIS that the case should be approved. USCIS approved the case and Ms. G is now a United States Citizen.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. C from Mexico hired Mathur Law Offices when he was charged with possession of drugs. Mr. Mathur worked on his case to convince the prosecutors to dismiss his drug charges. Based on Mr. Mathur's arguments and representation in court, the drug charges were dismissed. Mr. Mathur then expunged his criminal record and advised him to file for naturalization. Ms. Sinha prepared and represented him at the naturalization interview. Ms. Sinha prepared Mr. C with specific instructions on handling questions and statement and convincingly argued that the case was approvable based on documents submitted. USCIS approved the case and Mr. C is now a naturalized US citizen.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. L from Mexico entered the USA without inspection in 2000 and later married a naturalized U.S. citizen. Mr. L hired Mathur Law Offices to get resident status for him. Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha advised Mr. L to file an immigrant petition and consular process with a provisional waiver. Ms. Sinha guided and helped Mr. L through the process and prepared a strong provisional waiver. Based on legal argument and evidence submitted USCIS granted the waiver.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. B from Lebanon consulted with Mr. Mathur and hired Mathur Law Offices when he was arrested for domestic violence. Mr. Mathur worked on the criminal case and got it dismissed and expunged so that it does not affect his immigration status as a permanent resident of US. Mr. Mathur then advised Mr. B to file for naturalization. Ms. Sinha under Mr. Mathur’s supervision worked on the naturalization case and submitted the application with legal arguments regarding Mr. B's eligibility for naturalization. Ms. Sinha prepared Mr. B for the interview with specific instructions on handling questions and statement. Ms. Sinha represented Mr. B at the interview and convincingly argued that the case was approvable based on documents submitted. USCIS approved the case, and Mr. B is now a naturalized US citizen.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Ms. R from Nepal entered the USA with a visa in 2000 and overstayed. She left the US in 2015 and later married a naturalized U.S. citizen. Ms. R hired Mathur Law Offices to help her immigrate to the US. Ms. Sinha advised Ms. R to file an immigrant petition and consular process with a waiver for illegal presence. Ms. Sinha guided and helped Ms. R through the process and prepared a strong waiver of hardship. Ms. R appeared at the consulate in Nepal for her interview. Based on the hardship waiver submitted, Ms. R's case was approved. She is now a permanent resident and united with her spouse and child in the US.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. I came to Mr. Mathur desperate due to an arrest for Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon. Mr. I had been arrested by the Frisco Police Department for allegedly intentionally running over another person. After research into the case, Mr. Mathur determined that this was not an intentional act but an accident. Mr. Mathur and Mr. Garcia began collecting witnesses statements and put together a package to the Grand Jury to drop the case. Mr. Mathur received word that after the documents were delivered the District Attorney decided against bringing the case. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Garcia.
Mr. M from Mexico entered the USA without inspection in 2000 and later married a U.S. citizen. Mr. M hired Mathur Law Offices to get resident status for him. Mr. Mathur advised Mr. M to file an immigrant petition and consular process with a provisional waiver. Ms. Sinha guided and helped Mr. M through the process and prepared a strong provisional waiver that was granted by USCIS. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. S came to the Mathur Law Offices after being arrested for DWI with child passenger. Normally, this type of offense is seen as a danger to the community and bonds are often denied. However, Mr. Mathur and Mr. Clote provided the client with all the information and evidence needed to argue that Mr. C was not a danger and had the ability to remain in the U.S. After extensive preparation of the bond application and supporting documents, the Court granted bond and Mr. S was released. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Clote.
Ms. S came to Mr. Mathur after she had pleaded guilty to Indecency with a Child. Ms. S was in deportation/removal proceedings. After Mr. S studied the case, he discovered the only way to keep Ms. S in the country was to remove the basis of the deportation, namely, the conviction for Indecency. Mr. Mathur investigated both the criminal and deportation cases and found that the criminal case was not based on facts that warranted a conviction. Mr. Mathur filed motions to reopen the criminal case and after three (3) attempts, succeeded at getting the criminal case reopened. Thereafter, Mr. Mathur reopened the removal case and on August 3, 2016, the Immigration Judge reluctantly dismissed the deportation case as there was now no reason for removal. Ms. S's resident status was reinstated and she is now applying for citizenship. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mr. G hired Mr. Mathur after being arrested for felony gun charges. Mr. Mathur convinced the grand jury that the case should be a misdemeanor and not a felony. After months of pending as a misdemeanor, Mr. Mathur convinced the prosecution that they should dismiss the case. Mr. G who has never been in trouble with the law can now maintain his law abiding record! Result by Mr. Mathur.
Ms. D consulted with Mathur Law Offices after her naturalization case was denied earlier when filed by another law firm because she could not pass teh English test. Ms. Sinha advised Ms. D to re-file the petition and prepared the case. Ms. Sinha prepared Ms. D for the naturalization test and took Ms. D for the interview at USCIS . Ms. D's case was approved and she is now a naturalized United States Citizen. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. H came to Mathur Law Offices when his wife took away their daughter. Mr. H had also just been arrested for allegedly assaulting his mother in law and his brother in law. The in laws and wife were very angry and filed criminal charges against Mr. H. Mr. Mathur and Mr. Beuerlein went to work taking depositions and dismantling the stories related to the alleged assault. When no settlement could be reached, Mr. Mathur tried the case to the Court. The Court was satisfied that no family violence had been found and awarded split custody to Mr. H. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Beuerlein.
Three clients came to Mathur Law Offices when charged with Theft cases. The allegations were they were acting at or around the same time to steal from retail stores. Mr. Mathur and Mr. Garcia moved for discovery and pulled the cases apart. All three cases were dismissed! Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Garcia!
Three clients came to Mathur Law Offices when charged with Theft cases. The allegations were they were acting at or around the same time to steal from retail stores. Mr. Mathur and Mr. Garcia moved for discovery and pulled the cases apart. All three cases were dismissed! Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Garcia!
Mr. T came to visit us after being charged with family violence. Due to the high security clearances related to his position, no stain on his record could be had. After a vigorous defense, Mr. T's nightmare of being accused of a crime came to an end, the case was dismissed!
Mr. H came to hire Mathur Law Offices when charged with drug possession. After months of working on the case, Mr. Garcia was able to successfully have the case dismissed without probation or further prosecution! Result by Mr. Garcia!
Mr. T hired the Mr. Mathur when all hope had run out on his deportation case. Mr. T was ordered to be removed from the United States despite entering years ago on a legal visa. Despite his U.S. citizen wife's extreme medical hardship and willingness to petition for him, nothing could be done as he pleaded guilty to a drug case. Mr. Mathur presented a motion to the trial court based on discretion and equity that his plea was made without his effective consent. The trial judge and the prosecution agreed that plea was unjust and agreed to withdraw the plea. Mr. T is now eligible to reopen his immigration case and seek an adjustment of status through his ailing wife. Result by Mr. Mathur
Mr. D hired Mathur Law Offices to file for his naturalization. Mr. D had a family violence conviction in the past that could be a basis of denial of naturalization and removal for Mr. D. Ms. Sinha under Mr. Mathur's supervision advised Mr. D that he could still get the naturalization approved with strong legal argument as he was eligible to become a naturalized citizen of United States. Ms. Sinha prepared Mr. D for the interview with specific instructions on handling questions and statement. Ms. Sinha represented Mr D at the interview and convincingly argued that the case was approvable based on documents submitted. USCIS approved the case and Mr. D is now a naturalized US citizen.
Ms. F entered US with inspection and has lived in US form more than ten years. She married her US citizen same sex partner and came to consult with Mathur Law Offices after the same sex marriages were legally recognized in US. Ms. Sinha worked on Ms. F's case under Mr. Mathur's supervision and filed for his adjustment of status to become a permanent resident of US. Ms. Sinha prepared Ms. F and her partner for their interview with USCIS and represented them on their case. USCIS approved Ms. F's case. Ms. F is a permanent resident of US. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Ms. A. came to Mathur Law Offices following a Notice of Intent to Deny her application for Temporary Protected Status after the USCIS had alleged a fraudulent marriage. Without a successful application for a waiver of inadmissibility, Ms. A's application for TPS would be denied. Mr. Mathur and Mr. Clote prepared a waiver application, sworn statement, and filed all necessary documents in support of the response to the Request for Evidence. Ms. A was approved for Temporary Protected Status. Result by Mr. Clote and Mr. Mathur.
Mr. SG came to Mathur Law Offices after being displeased with another local lawyer's performance in his divorce case. Mr. SG stated that the case had been to mediation and failed. Mr. SG stated that his goals to win custody over his 14 year old daughter and seek the correct settlement on property had not been met. Mr. Mathur provided instructions and the case was prepared for trial. The case was tried and Mr. SG won custody over his daughter and the property settlement was entered favorably. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Williams.
Mr. A hired Mathur Law Offices for naturalization. Mr. A was convicted for possesssion of drugs. Ms. Sinha worked on Mr. A's case under Mr. Mathur's supervision and prepared case and legal arguments. Mr. Sinha represented Mr. A for naturalization interview and convincingly argued that the offense did not preclude Mr. A's naturalization. USCIS approved Mr. A's case. Mr. A is a naturalized citizen of US.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. L came to see Mr. Mathur after he missed a court date. While reopening a case where no notice was received is easier. In Mr. L's case the notice of the court date had been provided. Mr. Mathur had to argue exceptional circumstances beyond Mr. L's control. Through careful review, preparation and submission, the Motion to Reopen was GRANTED! Result by Mr. Mathur
Mr. G hired Mr. Mathur because the police had a warrant for him for Aggravated Robbery. The bail was set at $50,000.00 and there would be no way for Mr. G to get out of jail. Mr. G's problems were worse because he was an illegal immigrant. As such, he would not be able to hire a surety bail bondsmen. Mr. Mathur convinced the criminal judge that $5000.00 would be appropriate in light of the immigration bail that the firm would seek and the relief available to the client. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mr. C hired the Mr. Mathur years ago. Mr. C's wife is a U.S. citizen and he has children with her. Mr. C described that he was charged for a non-waivable drug offense and he pleaded guilty on the advice of his old lawyer. Mr. Mathur realized that Mr. C's old lawyer had failed to advise Mr. C that he would be inadmissible for life with the conviction. Mr. Mathur filed a Writ to undo the criminal conviction and succeeded. Mr. Mathur's team then filed Mr. C's paperwork to get his resident status. Mr. C's case was approved. Result by Mr. Mathur and team Mathur!
Mr. B, a citizen of Nepal entered US as a student. He was robbed twice at gun point at a gas station. Based on the incidences, he was eligible to file U-visa that is available to victims of certain crime in US. Ms. Sinha worked on gathering evidence and getting certification from police officials for Mr. B's U-visa. Ms. Sinha convincingly prepared and submitted Mr. B's U-visa application and responses to request for evidences from USCIS. base on the evidence submitted and arguments presented, Mr. B's work authorization and U visa was approved by USCIS. Mr. B will be eligible to become a permanent resident of US.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. O from Nigeria hired Mathur Law Offices when his naturalization case was wrongly denied by USCIS due to issues with his tax filing. Ms. Sinha under Mr. Mathur's supervision worked on the case and filed the naturalization application with legal argument. Ms. Sinha represented Mr. O at the interview and convinced USCIS that the case should be approved. USCIS approved the case and Mr. O is now a United States Citizen.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. C from Philippines came to Mathur Law Offices when her conditional resident status was terminated and she was placed in removal proceedings and had missed all deadlines to file appeal. Based on her circumstances Mr. Mathur advised her on getting the case reopened by filing untimely motions. Mr. Mathur filed motions to get the case reopened. Ms. Sinha worked under Mr. Mathur's supervision to get Ms. C's proceedings terminated and resident status reinstated. After Ms. C was granted resident status Ms. Sinha filed Ms. C's naturalization application. Ms. Sinha represented Ms. C at the USCIS interview and convinced SUCIS officer to approve her case. Ms. C is now a US citizen.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. R, an illegal citizen from Mexico came to consult with Mr. Mathur when he was convicted of felony. Mr Mathur reviewed his criminal background and advised him that he was eligible to become a permanent resident despite his felony conviction. Ms. Sinha worked on the case under Mr. Mathur's supervision and prepared a strong and convincing waiver application. Ms. Sinha represented Mr. R at the interview and convinced USCIS that Mr. R should be granted permanent resident status. Based on the waiver submitted and legal arguments Mr. R was granted permanent resident status in US. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. G from Mexico entered the USA without inspection in 2000 and later married a naturalized U.S. citizen. Mr. G hired Mathur Law Offices to get resident status for him. Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha advised Mr. G to file an immigrant petition and consular process with a provisional waiver. Ms. Sinha guided and helped Mr. G through the process and prepared a strong provisional waiver that was granted by USCIS. Ms. Sinha prepare his case for immigrant visa and interview. Mr. G's case was approved after interview in Mexico. He is now a permanent resident of US and happily united with his family in US.
Ms. K from Pakistan entered the USA with a visa in 2000 and overstayed. She left the U.S. in 2009 and later married a naturalized U.S. citizen. Ms. K hired Mathur Law Offices to help her immigrate to U.S. Ms. Sinha advised Ms. K to file an immigrant petition and consular process with a waiver for illegal presence. Ms. Sinha guided and helped Ms. K through the process and prepared a strong waiver of hardship. Ms. K appeared at the consulate in Pakistan for her interview. Based on the hardship waiver submitted, Ms. K's case was approved. She is now a permanent resident and united with her spouse and child in U.S.
Ms. S hired the Mr. Mathur after she pleaded guilty to Indecency with Minor by Exposure. Ms. S was put in removal proceedings. The only way to keep Ms. S in the United States was to have her old conviction withdrawn. Mr. Mathur filed a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the criminal court. Mr. Mathur argued that the plea was not entered into freely, knowingly and voluntarily as Ms. S was unaware that this would lead to certain deportation. The Judge agreed with the argument and the conviction was reversed and later dismissed by the prosecutor.
Ms. F hired Mr. Mathur because she was arrested and accused of family violence assault against her boyfriend. Ms. F submitted that she was the victim not the villain in the disturbance. Mr. Mathur and Mr. Garcia collected evidence to support her argument and submitted it to the prosecution. The case was dropped and no charges were taken to court. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Garcia.
Mr. O had been a client of Mathur Law Offices, P.C. in the past. This time, the police arrested him and placed him under a $25,000.00 bond for allegedly strangling his family member. Mr. Mathur went right to work on the case and requested that a dismissal package be put in front of the Grand Jury. When the Grand Jury reviewed the case, they agreed the case should be dismissed and "No Billed" the charges. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Garcia.
Mr. G hired Mathur Law Offices as he is a citizen of El Salvador and was charged with family violence with bodily injury. Knowing that he could suffer removal from the United States, the Mathur Legal Team prepared the case for trial. On the trial date, the prosecution agreed they could not prove the case any longer and dismissed the case with no punishment whatsoever. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Garcia.
Mr. K hired the Mathur legal team after being charged with Gambling. Due to the nature of the conviction, the case had to be dismissed or Mr. K would be placed in deportation/removal. Mr. Mathur and Mr. Garcia went about defending the case and ultimately, the case was dismissed. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Garcia.
Mr. I hired Mathur Law Offices as he was a resident that wanted to become a citizen. The concern he had was a prostitution conviction. The Mathur team argued with USCIS arguing that the conviction was not a CIMT and did not prohibit naturalization, the case was approved. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. A hired the Mathur Law Offices when he was placed in removal proceedings. Mr. Mathur reviewed the case outlined strategy for Mr. A to become a permanent resident based on physical and emotional abuse he suffered at the hands of his US citizen wife. Ms. Sinha prepared a convincing VAWA case for Mr. A that was approved by USCIS. Based on the approved VAWA, Mr. A was eligible to adjust status as a permanent resident. Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha appealed the Immigration Judge's prior removal decision on Mr. A's case to BIA. BIA agreed with the appeal and reversed Immigration Judge's decision and remanded the case back to the Judge to allow Mr. A to remain in the U.S.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Ms. L came to see Mr. Mathur because she realized that she had a problem with her immigration record. She was not in removal proceedings but had been convicted, years ago, of a drug trafficking crime for large amounts of Marijuana. Mr. Mathur advised that he would file a Post-Conviction Writ to reverse the plea since there were errors in the way her lawyer handled the case. After having the Writ Granted, Mr. Mathur handled a dismissal of the case as it could not be proven against Ms. L. Ms. L then asked Mr. Mathur if she could file for citizenship. Mr. Mathur agreed to take the case and Ms. L's citizenship has been approved. Result by Mr. Mathur, Ms. Sinha.
Mr. F hired Mathur Law Offices for naturalization. Mr. F was convicted of felony, robbery. Ms. Sinha worked on Mr. F's case under Mr. Mathur's supervision and prepared case and legal arguments. Mr. Sinha represented Mr. F for naturalization interview and convincingly argued that the offense did not preclude Mr. F's naturalization. USCIS approved Mr. F's case. Mr. F is a naturalized citizen of US. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. V hired Mr. Mathur when his wife ran off with his baby daughter. After efforts to have his wife return with their daughter failed, Mr. V. requested that a divorce be filed and custody orders be sought. Mr. V's wife hired a lawyer and accused Mr. V of family violence and being neglectful over their child. Mr. V's wife was breast feeding and so the baby stayed the majority of the time with the mother initially. Mr. Mathur continued the fight in court and had the court deny any claims of family violence, deny claims of neglect and increased Mr. V's possession of the child. Mr. Mathur won every hearing before the Court before finally before trial the opposing side agreed to all of Mr. V's demands including equal access, 50/50 custody, equal rights, no child support and other agreements to ensure that the child was equally cared for. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mr. N, who is not a citizen of the United States, hired Mr. Mathur for his criminal defense case. Mr. N's wife accused him of domestic violence and strangulation, a felony. Since Mr. N hired Mr. Mathur early on in the proceedings, Mr. Mathur directed Mr. N's case to be argued in front of the Grand Jury by submitting an argument for dismissal. Mr. Garcia, worked on Mr. Mathur's instructions and the case was submitted. The Dallas Grand Jury "No Billed" Mr. N, thereby dismissing the felony charges. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Garcia.
Mr. K, from Nepal, entered US on a visa and married a United States Citizen. Within a few year of marriage, his spouse started abusing him and Mr. K's marriage started falling apart due to spousal abuse, violence, and adultery. Mr. K came to Mr. Mathur. Mr. Mathur advised Mr. K to seek a divorce and collect evidence in the divorce of the wife's misconduct and adultery. Ms. Sinha worked on the case under Mr. Mathur's supervision and collected all evidence of abuse. The divorce was granted. Mr. K was a victim of abuse and filed a Violence Against Women's Act (VAWA) petition. USCIS approved Mr. K's VAWA case. Ms. Sinha worked on Mr. K's adjustment of status and represented him at the interview. His adjustment of status was granted. Mr. K is a permanent resident of US. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. A hired Mr. Mathur when he was a conditional resident on felony drug charges. After fighting all the felony drug charges and getting each and every one of the dismissed, Mr. A hired Mr. Mathur again to get the conditions of his residency removed. Based on the dismissals, Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha were able to get the residency restrictions removed. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Ms. S hired Mathur Law Offices for naturalization. Ms. S was convicted of disorderly conduct within five years of good moral character period for naturalization. Ms. Sinha worked on Ms. S's case under Mr. Mathur's supervision and prepared case and legal arguments. Mr. Sinha represented Ms. S for naturalization interview and convincingly argued that the offense did not preclude Ms. S's naturalization. USCIS approved Ms. S's case. Ms. S is scheduled to take oath and be a naturalized citizen of US.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. H hired the Mathur Law Offices when he was placed in removal proceedings. Mr. H did not recall that he entered the U.S. with a visa at first. When he went before the Judge, it was decided that he did not enter with a visa and was not allowed to remain. On discovery of a visa admission document, the Mathur team advised the Judge that Mr. H did enter with a visa. The Judge refused to change the case and ordered Mr. H removed. The Mathur team filed an appeal and addressed the abuse of discretion by the Judge, the BIA agreed with the appeal and reversed and remanded the case back to the Judge to allow Mr. H to remain in the U.S.
Mr. G hired Mathur Law Offices for naturalization. Mr. G was charged with felony for Burglary of Habitat. Ms. Sinha worked on Mr. G's case under Mr. Mathur's supervision and prepared case and legal arguments. Mr. Sinha represented Mr. G for naturalization interview and convincingly argued that the offense did not preclude Mr. G's naturalization. USCIS approved Mr. G's case. Mr. G is a naturalized citizen of US. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Ms. T's family hired Mr. Mathur when she was arrested and detained at the airport on her way back from Pakistan. Ms. T was being held without bond even though she was a resident alien based on her conviction for more than $29,000.00 in losses on a credit card fraud case. Mr. Mathur and Ms. Almaraz worked hard to get Ms. T set for trial as soon as possible as she was subject to mandatory custody. An application for a waiver was filed and evidence was collected to show that if Mr. T was not pardoned for her crime, extreme hardship would come to her family. At trial, the Mathur Law Offices, P.C.' preparation convinced the Court to grant the pardon and allow Ms. H to be released from custody the same day. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Almaraz.
Mr. M hired Mr. Mathur when he was arrested and charged with felony Tampering with Government Documents and Driving While Intoxicated. Mr. M was in criminal custody and had an immigration hold. After having Mr. M release from criminal and immigration jail, Mr. Mathur filed pre-trial motions to dismiss the felony based on illegal search and seizure. This motion on the felony was granted and the felony case had to be dismissed. Mr. Mathur also filed an additional motion to suppress evidence relating to admission on how much Mr. M had to drink in the DWI case. This motion was also granted. Finally, Mr. Mathur tried the remainder of the case to a Dallas County jury, who acquitted Mr. M of DWI in less than 17 minutes of deliberation. Result by Mr. Mathur.
M. B hired our firm to file for divorce and custody of a three month old child when his marriage was not working out. Mr. B wanted joint custody and visitation with the child. Ms. Sinha mediated the case under Mr. Mathur's supervision and settled the case successfully. Mr. B has joint custody of the child and his ex-wife will be responsible for the child care and private school expenses. Mr. B also gets to keep his retirement account and any property he accumulated during his marriage. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Ms. R hired Mr. Mathur when she was charged with removability for a drug offense for suspected large amounts of marijuana. During the deportation case, Mr. Mathur showed that the conviction documents from Tennessee did not accurately reflect a large amount of marijuana and argued that the conviction was for a small amount of the drug. The immigration judge agreed with Mr. Mathur and allowed Ms. R to file a waiver to keep her resident card. After winning the removal case, Mr. Mathur filed for naturalization of Ms. R. Again, the Mathur team had to argue that the offense did not preclude naturalization. Ms. R's naturalization is now approved and Mr. R never has to worry about her life in the U.S. again. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Ms. M hired our firm to file for divorce when things were not working out with his spouse and his spouse filed for divorce. Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha represented Mr. M and successfully settled and finalized the case in court to achieve Mr. D's goals.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. L entered US without inspection and has lived in US form more than ten years. He married his US citizen same sex partner and came to consult with Mathur Law Offices, P.C. after the same sex marriages were legally recognized in US. Ms. Sinha worked on Mr. L's case under Mr. Mathur's supervision and filed for his adjustment of status to become a permanent resident of US. Ms. Sinha prepared Mr. L and his partner for their interview with USCIS and represented them on their case. USCIS approved Mr. L's case. Mr. L is a permanent resident of US and is able to visit his family in Mexico after several years.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. J entered the USA without inspection in 2003 and later married a U.S. citizen. Mr. J hired Mathur Law Offices, P.C. to get his resident status. Mr. Mathur advised Mr. P to file an immigrant petition and consular process with a provisional waiver. Ms. Sinha guided and helped Mr. J through the process and submitted a strong provisional waiver application. USCIS issued a request for evidence to prove eligiblity despite criminal convictions. Ms. Sinha responded to the request with arguments and authorities convincing USCIS that Mr. J's waiver should be granted and his criminal convictions do not make him ineligible for waiver. USCIS granted the waiver within a week of receiving the response. Mr. J is now scheduled for his immigrant visa interview to become a permanent resident of USA.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. N from Mexico entered the USA without inspection in 2000 and later married a naturalized U.S. citizen. Mr. N hired Mathur Law Offices, P.C. to get resident status for him. Mr. Mathur advised Mr. N to file an immigrant petition and consular process with a provisional waiver. Ms. Sinha guided and helped Mr. N through the process and prepared a strong provisional waiver that was granted by USCIS.
Mr. G hired our firm to file for a divorce action against his wife for more than fifteen years when she filed for divorce. Mr. G wanted ot keep his house and custody and visitation of his children. Ms. Sinha successfully completed the divorce in court under Mr. Mathur's supervision to get Mr. G his desired outcome. Mr. G was awarded the house and granted custody and visitation.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. K hired Mathur Law Offices, P.C. to file his wrongly denied naturalization application. Mr. K's case was denied due to a past incidence of assault/violence that was dismissed. Ms. Sinha under Mr. Mathur's supervision advised Mr. K that he needed to appeal the wrong denial with strong legal argument as he was eligible to become a naturalized citizen of United States. Ms. Sinha prepared Mr. K's appeal and represented him at the interview and convincingly argued that the case was approvable based on documents submitted. USCIS admitted to the wrong denial and approved Mr. K's case and set oath ceremony for Mr. K.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. M hired our firm to represent him in his divorce when things were not working out with his spouse. Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha represented Mr. M in his divorce. Ms. Sinha mediated and successfully settled Mr. M's case under Mr. Mathur's supervision to achieve Mr. M's goals. Mr. M is happily divorced now.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. B hired our firm to represent him in his divorce when his marriage was not working out. Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha worked on Mr. B's case to get him his desired result. After reviewing the facts in the divorce, Mr. Mathur filed a Motion for Summary Judgments to get the case granted on Mr. B's terms. Mr. Mathur convincingly argued the case in court. Mr. B's divorce was granted in his favor based on summary judgment.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Ms. D, a 23 year old citizen of Mexico entered US without inspection when she was a child. She lived and studied in US and completed high school. Ms. D had a criminal offense in Dallas. Ms. Sinha prepared and submitted her Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals application with arguments that she was eligible for approval despite her criminal conviction. USCIS was convinced with the arguments and approved Ms. D's application and work authorization.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. K, a citizen of Nepal entered US as a student. He was robbed at gun point at a gas station. Based on the incidence, he was eligible to file U-visa that is available to victims of certain crime in US. Ms. Sinha worked on gathering evidence and getting certification from police officials for Mr. K's U-visa. Ms. Sinha convincingly prepared Mr. K's U-visa application. Mr. K's work authorization and U visa was approved by USCIS. Mr. K will be eligible to become a permanent resident of US.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Ms. P, from Ethopia, entered US on a visa and married a United States Citizen. Within a few year of marriage, her spouse started abusing her and Ms. P's marriage started falling apart due to spousal abuse, violence, and adultery. Ms. P came to Mr. Mathur. Mr. Mathur advised Ms. P to seek a divorce and collect evidence in the divorce of the husband's misconduct and adultery. Ms. Sinha worked on the case under Mr. Mathur's supervision and collected all evidence of abuse. The divorce was granted. Ms. P was a victim of abuse and filed a Violence Against Women's Act (VAWA) petition. USCIS approved Ms. P's VAWA case. Ms. Sinha filed Ms. P's adjustment of status application and represented her at the interview. Her adjustment of status was granted. Ms. P is a permanent resident of US.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Ms. N came to Mathur Law Offices, P.C. to get help with a divorce, domestic violence and child custody issues. Ms. Sinha and Mr. Mathur prepared the case and filed the divorce pleadings and requested that the mother be awarded full custody of their child, interim attorney's fees amongst other forms of relief designed to protect Ms. N and her child. At hearing, Mr. Mathur presented the case and Ms. N was awarded all relief. The other side appealed and Mr. Mathur filed a Motion to Strike the Appeal and a Motion for Sanctions. The Court granted the Motion to Strike and granted sanctions in the form of attorney's fees to Ms. N. In all, over $16,000.00 in attorney's fees were granted along protections such as supervised access to the father of the child. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. Y came to Mathur Law Offices, P.C. when he was arrested and charged with Indecent Exposure. An undercover police officer, posing as a prostitute, accused Mr. Y of the charge. The officer testified that she eye witnessed the events. Due to the nature of the case, the District Attorney's Office was unwilling to negotiate. Mr. Mathur filed a Motion to Suppress Evidence based on illegal detention of Mr. Y and illegal surveillance. The Court heard the testimony of the undercover police office and the cross-examination and argument of Mr. Mathur. The Motion to Suppress was granted and all evidence on the case was thrown out. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Ms. C came to Mr. Mathur after she was arrested and charged with assaulting her boyfriend. Ms. C had no prior offenses and the police took it from the scene that she had committed the domestic violence case. The boyfriend did not volunteer to drop charges and the State of Texas continued to prosecute. Mr. Mathur took over the case and after several court meetings, received an agreed dismissal of all charges without probation. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mr. C came to the Mathur Law Offices, P.C. after becoming concerned about his daughter's behavior. Mr. C was not married to the mother and the mother had returned to a boyfriend who Mr. C believed to be guilty of family violence. Although there was no accusation of violence against the child, Mr. C, who had no prior orders relating to custody, thought it best that he take over custody of his four year old daughter. Mr. Stevenson and Mr. Mathur prepared the case. Mr. Mathur argued the case at special hearing. The Court granted Mr. C sole managing conservatorship, primary possession, child support and ordered the mother to have only supervised visitation. Thereby, awarding Mr. C full custody of their child. Result by Mr. Stevenson and Mr. Mathur.
Mr. P came to hire Mathur Law Offices, P.C., when he was arrested for domestic violence and found to be an illegal alien. Mr. Mathur worked with his team to quickly have Mr. P released from jail. Thereafter, Mr. Mathur worked for months to secure a dismissal of the criminal case so that the matter would not interfere with Mr. P's immigration. The Mathur team is now filing for Mr. P's legalization. Result by Mr. Mathur
Mr. M hired Mathur Law Offices, P.C. after he was arrested and discovered to be an illegal alien. Mr. M was charged with discharging a firearm and unlawful carrying of a weapon. These charges would have resulted in permanent inadmissibility if they were not dismissed. The offenses allegedly occurred in front of a policeman and the prosecutors were vehemently opposed to a favorable disposition. After several months of negotiation, Mr. Mathur personally took over the case and was able to secure dismissals on both cases. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mr. S came to hire Mr. Mathur with 2 Dallas DWI Probation violations. Mr. S had not paid fines and court costs, completed his probation and had committed a 3 DWI in Tarrant County. Through a lot of negotiation, Mr. Mathur was able to get Tarrant County to continue Mr. S on probation despite three (3) DWIs and violations of probation and was able to get the Judge in Dallas to dismiss both DWI probations without completion of all terms and conditions. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mr. S hired the Mathur Law Offices, P.C. when he was arrested for three (3) back to back counts for DWI. Mr. S was facing jail time as a result of picking up so many cases. Mr. Mathur worked with the DA to get probation. Mr. S then violated his probation by failing an alcohol monitoring test. Mr. S faced certain jail. However, Mr. Mathur convinced the Judge that the Court should dismiss the revocation and continue probation despite the three DWI convictions. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Ms. N hired the Mathur Law Offices, P.C. when she was served by her divorce papers. She reported that her husband had concealed assets, physically abused her and abandoned her and their baby with no means of support. Ms. Sinha prepared documents to rectify this situation and Mr. Mathur argued the case in Court. Mr. Mathur was able to get over $15,000.00 of funds for attorney's fees, $1,200.00 a month child support and $1,200.00 a month spousal support. Furthermore, Mr. Mathur was able to secure orders to ensure Ms. N's safety and the welfare of their child. Result by Ms. Sinha and Mr. Mathur.
Mr. D hired the Mathur Law Offices, P.C. when he wanted to apply for naturalization. Although counseled that USCIS has historically denied cases wherein there lies a DWI within five years of the application, Mr. D went forward with the application. The MLO team put together a legal argument that DWI was not a crime that caused the denial of naturalization and filed the application. Mr. D's case was approved! Result by Mr. Mathur, Ms. Sinha and Mr. Urenda.
Mr. D hired the Mathur Law Offices, P.C. when he wanted to apply for naturalization. Although counseled that USCIS has historically denied cases wherein there lies a DWI within five years of the application, Mr. D went forward with the application. The MLO team put together a legal argument that DWI was not a crime that caused the denial of naturalization and filed the application. Mr. D's case was approved! Result by Mr. Mathur, Ms. Sinha and Mr. Urenda.
Mr. A came to Mr. Mathur when he was distressed that he had been ordered removed from the United States. Mr. A's family was legal but he suffered from the threat of having to leave at any moment. Despite the deportation order being several years old, Mr. Mathur devised a plan to reopen Mr. A's case. After filing a Motion to Reopen Mr. A's case, the case was reopened with an agreement by the government that Mr. A could now adjust his status in the U.S. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Urenda.
Mr. A from Nigeria hired Mathur Law Offices, P.C. after his marriage to United States Citizen wife was not working out because of her abusive nature and Mr. A was put in removal proceedings. Based on the evidence of abuse, Mr. Mathur advised on filing a divorce and Violence Against Women's Act petition. Ms. Sinha worked on the case under Mr. Mathur's supervision and collected all evidence of abuse and requested a stay for Mr. A. Mr. A's Request for Stay was granted based on the evidence of abuse. After filing the divorce, Ms. Sinha convincingly argued that Mr. A was a victim of abuse and filed a Violence Against Women's Act petition. Ms. A's divorce was granted based on cruelty and assault and his Violence Against Women's Act petition was approved. Mr. A is now eligible to become a permanent resident. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Ms. S's family hired our firm when she was stopped at the airport after returning from a vacation. Ms. S is a news reporter and anchor on a local television station. However, she was born in Mexico and immigrated to the U.S. as a child. She had two theft convictions after becoming a resident and therefore, was inadmissible under the law and subject to detention. Mr. Mathur got involved and Ms. S was released from custody. Mr. Mathur then set the removal case for trial on the basis that Ms. S was eligible for cancellation since she had fully reformed her life. The team at Mathur Law Offices, P.C., gathered evidence and the case was presented by Mr. Mathur. Ms. S was granted cancellation and now her residency is restored. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Urenda.
Mr. A's family has used the Mr. Mathur's services for several cases. When he learned he was going to be deported and subject to mandatory detention as a result of pleading guilty with another lawyer to sexual assault, the family called Mr. Mathur for help. Upon reaching the case, Mr. Mathur realized the client had pleaded guilty and a thirty (30) day motion for new trial deadline was approaching. Mr. Mathur quickly filed a Motion for New Trial requesting that the guilty plea be withdrawn as the previous counsel had failed to act effectively in representing Mr. A. On hearing, Mr. Mathur cross-examined two lawyers that had worked on Mr. A's case and introduced audio evidence that prove that the lawyer in charge of the case had not represented Mr. A effectively. The Judge agreed that Mr. A's lawyers did not effectively represent Mr. A and GRANTED the Motion for New Trial. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Ms. G consulted with Mr. Mathur after she was charged with assault by contact that would have serious consequences on her immigration status in US. Mr. Mathur advised Ms. G on getting the case dismissed so that it does not affect her immigration status. Mr. Mathur talked to the prosecutor to work out a deal to get the case dismissed. Ms. G's is eligible to file her immigration papers now. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mr. K, from Nepal, entered US on a student visa and married a United States Citizen. Within a year of marriage, his spouse started abusing him and Mr. K's marriage started falling apart due to spousal abuse, violence, and adultery. Mr. K came to Mr. Mathur. Mr. Mathur advised Mr. K to seek a divorce and collect evidence in the divorce of the wife's misconduct and adultery. Ms. Sinha worked on the case under Mr. Mathur's supervision and collected all evidence of abuse. The divorce was granted. Mr. K was a victim of abuse and filed a Violence Against Women's Act petition. Ms. Sinha convincingly argued that Mr. K entered marriage in good faith and was later abuse. Mr. K's Violence Against Women's Act petition was approved. Mr. K has filed his adjustment of status application and is eligible to become a permanent resident. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. R consulted with Mr. Mathur to file for his naturalization. Mr. R had a drug offense in the past that could be a basis of denial of naturalization and removal for Mr. R. Mr. Mathur advised Mr. R that he could still get the naturalization approved with strong legal argument as he was eligible to become a naturalized citizen of United States. Ms. Sinha prepared Mr. R for the interview with specific instructions on handling questions and statement and represented Ms. R at the interview. Ms. Sinha convincingly argued that the case was approvable based on documents submitted. A request for evidence was issued on the past drug offense. Ms. Sinha under Mr. Mathur's supervision addressed the issues in the request for evidence. Based on the arguments, memorandum and response submitted with request for evidence USCIS approved the case and set oath ceremony for Mr. R. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. Q was going to the U.S. Border to get a renewal of his TN visa, when he was detained on suspicion that he was removable under a past order. Mr. Mathur review the case and argued that reinstatement and detention of Mr. Q was both improper and illegal and that Mr. Q was not inadmissible. Additionally Mr. Q was also eligible for re-instatement of his TN visa. Ms. Sinha followed up with Immigration Customs Enforcement official to release Mr. Q immediately. Mr.Q's TN visa was reinstated and he was released immediately. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. V consulted with Mr. Mathur and hired Mathur Law Offices, P.C. when he was put in removal proceedings for pleading guilty to a theft felony offense. Mr. Mathur advised on filing a post conviction writ for ineffective assistance of counsel to reverse prior orders. Mr. Stevenson worked on the post conviction writ and under Mr. Mathur's supervision. Ms. Malik worked on getting the documents and records. Mr. Mathur represented Mr. V in court. Based on his arguments, the post conviction writ.was granted. The State of Texas appealed trial court's decision. Mr. Mathur and Mr. Stevenson worked on the appeal. The court of appeals affirmed trial court's order. Mr. V is now eligible for immigration relief. Result by Mr. Mathur, Mr. Stevenson and Ms. Malik
Mr. H was born in Canada and hired Mathur Law Offices, P.C. for his Certificate of Citizenship application. Mr. Mathur reviewed the case and advised Mr. H on eligibility. Ms. Sinha research on case laws and prepared Mr. H's case. Ms. Sinha represented Mr. H at the interview and addressed issues regarding documents that USCIS was requesting and was not required by regulations to approve the case. USCIS agreed and approved Mr. H's case without request for additional documents. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. A hired Mr. Mathur after his wife returned to the country filed a Bill of Review to try to overturn a divorce decree he obtained against her. Although she was represented by one Dallas' premiere litigation firms, Mr. Mathur and Mr. Stevenson fought hard to prove that her request for temporary orders was invalid and unfounded. On the date of the hearing, the opposing attorney agreed in open court and withdrew the request for temporary relief. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Stevenson!
Mr. Mathur was hired by Mr. A who is a resident alien from Iran. Mr. Mathur worked as co-counsel on a criminal case involving felony theft from an employer. Although the District Attorney would not lower the case from a felony in prior settings, Mr. Mathur appeared with Co-Counsel and offered solutions to the prosecutor's concerns. The prosecutor agreed to lower the felony theft to a Class B Misdemeanor, which prevents Mr. A from becoming subject to removal to Iran. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mr. Y from Iran hired Mathur Law Offices, P.C. to file for asylum due to fear of persecution in his home country based on his religion and political opinion. Ms. Sinha under Mr. Mathur's supervision to prepared a strong case for Mr. Y. After the application was submitted Ms. Sinha prepared client for the interview. Mr. Y's case was approved by USCIS within two weeks of interview. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. Y from Iran hired Mathur Law Offices, P.C. to file for asylum due to fear of persecution in his home country based on his religion and political opinion. Ms. Sinha under Mr. Mathur's supervision to prepared a strong case for Mr. Y. After the application was submitted Ms. Sinha prepared client for the interview. Mr. Y's case was approved by USCIS within two weeks of interview. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. N's family hired Mr. Mathur when his case was being lost in immigration court. The immigration judge later erroneously found that he did not have jurisdiction over Mr. N's case and ordered him removed. Mr. Mathur filed an appeal with the Board of Immigration Appeals and argued the IJ was incorrect, that Mr. N's parole status into the country gave the IJ jurisdiction, the BIA agreed with Mr. Mathur reversed the judge and remanded the case back on the applications filed by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Malik. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Malik.
Ms. G entered the USA without inspection in 2003 and later married a U.S. citizen. Ms. G hired Mathur Law Offices, P.C. to get resident status for her and two children in Mexico. Mr. Mathur advised Ms. G to file an immigrant petition and consular process with a provisional waiver. Ms. Sinha guided and helped Ms. G through the process and prepared a strong provisional waiver that was granted by USCIS in four months.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. D came to office to file for his naturalization. Ms. D had a theft offense that could be a basis of denial of naturalization and removal for Ms. D. Mr. Mathur advised Ms. D that she could still get the naturalization approved with strong legal argument as she was eligible to become a naturalized citizen of United States. Ms. Sinha prepared Ms. D for the interview with specific instructions on handling questions and statement and represented Ms. D at the interview. Ms. Sinha convincingly argued that the case was approvable based on documents submitted. Based on the arguments and memorandum, USCIS approved the case and set oath ceremony for Ms. D on the same day. Ms. D is now a United States Citizen.. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. T came to see Mr. Mathur after being sued for an alleged breach of an employment agreement. The allegations were that Mr. T was now in breach of the non-competition clause of his employment agreement. After reviewing the facts, Mr. Mathur found that the employer was, in fact, the breaching party and had failed to pay Mr. T's wages appropriately. Mr. Mathur wrote back to the lawyers and advised that if the suit was not dropped immediately, counter-claims would be filed that would end up their client's liability. After receipt of the letter and deadline to respond, the opposing party agreed to drop the case entirely. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mr. C's family hired Mr. Mathur when they realized they were in over their heads on a deportation case. The family realized that Mr. C was in trouble as he was mentally disabled and had committed a number of removable crimes. Mr. Mathur and Ms. Malik investigated the case and found that there was a claim that Mr. C was a U.S. Citizen. Ms. Malik filed a Motion to Terminate the case due to the claim of citizenship. The Court granted the motion and the deportation case was dismissed and Mr. C was released from custody. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Malik.
Mr. M hired Mr. Mathur on a felony and DWI case, with deportation issues. Mr. Mathur had the felony dismissed due to an illegal search and seizure. Mr. Mathur then filed a second motion to throw out statements on the DWI. Mr. Mathur proved to the Court that statements made by Mr. M during his stop relating to how much he drank that night were illegally obtained. The Court granted this motion and the statements were suppressed! Result by Mr. Mathur.
After hiring Mr. Mathur on three (3) other cases in the past, Mr. L's family called on him once more when Mr. L was indicted and arrested as the lead defendant on a federal drug conspiracy case. Mr. Mathur quickly went to work on getting Mr. L released from custody. Mr. Mathur argued strong family ties, property ties and lack of criminal history favored Mr. L over the government's motion to keep him detained. The federal judge agreed with Mr. Mathur and set a property bond for Mr. L. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Ms. S came to see Mr. Mathur after realizing that she wanted to adjust her status through her father's petition. Unfortunately, Ms. S had entered into a marriage that prevented her from adjusting her status. Mr. Mathur found that the was a basis to sue for an annulment on the marriage. After successfully annulling the marriage, Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha successfully adjusted Ms. S's status to a resident. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Ms. S came to see Mr. Mathur after realizing that she wanted to adjust her status through her father's petition. Unfortunately, Ms. S had entered into a marriage that prevented her from adjusting her status. Mr. Mathur found that there was a basis to sue for an annulment on the marriage. After successfully annulling the marriage, Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha successfully adjusted Ms. S's status to a resident. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. H was arrested for assault family violence. Mr. Mathur and Ms. Malik wanted to try to get a dismissal on the case. Due to the grisly details of the incident, the prosecutors were unwilling to dismiss the case. Ms. Malik continued to work and negotiate with the prosecutors until they ultimately agreed to a dismissal. Mr. Malik instructed Mr. H to fulfill certain requirements, and once he did, the case was dismissed! Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Malik.
Mr. M was incarcerated on a felony drug conviction. Prior to turning himself in, he picked up another felony drug case in a different county that remained pending while he was in jail. Mr. Mathur outlined what needed to be done, and Ms. Malik promptly acted. She contacted the fugitive department to get a warrant served to the right place, had Mr. M brought over to the county in which the case was pending , and convinced the prosecutor to give Mr. M a concurrent jail sentence on the new felony charge. Mr. M had a new conviction, but would not have to serve any additional time! Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Malik.
Mr. A applied for and received an H1 visa. Mr. A came to Mr. Mathur after being placed in removal proceedings. The allegations were that Mr. A did not maintain his status. After reviewing the case, Mr. Mathur developed a plan to show that the case should be dismissed early and that proof was available that the allegations were untrue. Rather than wait on a court date, Mr. Mathur instructed that a Motion to Terminate be filed and the case moved up on the Court's docket. The Motion was GRANTED and the case was DISMISSED! Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Malik.
Ms. R entered the United States without inspection in 2001 and later married a U.S. citizen. Ms. R hired Mathur Law Offices, P.C. to get her resident status. Mr. Mathur advised Ms. R to file an immigrant petition and consular process with a waiver. Ms. Sinha worked on the case detailing all the hardships to the USC spouse and children and prepared a strong waiver application. USCIS approved Ms. R's waiver application. Ms. R returns home to her husband and kids in U.S. as a permanent resident. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. Y came to office to file for his naturalization. It was discovered during the consultation that Mr. Y had not disclosed important information on his application for permanent residence status filed by him in the past. This could be a basis for denial of naturalization and removal for Mr. Y. Mr. Mathur advised Mr. Y that he could still get the naturalization approved with argument that it was not a material component of Mr. Y's admission, and therefore should not be a basis for removal or denial of naturalization. Ms. Sinha researched case laws and prepared a convincing legal memorandum to file with USCIS. Ms. Sinha prepared Mr. Y for the interview with specific instructions on how to handle questions and statement and represented Mr. Y at the interview. Ms. Sinha convincingly argued that the case was approvable based on documents submitted. Mr. Y followed Ms. Sinha's advice when a USCIS officer tried to extract unnecessary facts from him and make him sign statements under oath. Based on the argument and memorandum, USCIS approved the case. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. and Mrs. A retained the firm after being placed in removal proceedings. Mr. Mathur reviewed the basis for removal and found a way to defend the case. Mr. Mathur provided specific instructions on a Motion to Terminate. Prior to the first court date ever taking place, Ms. Malik obtained evidence and prepared motions for DHS counsel and the immigration court to terminate both cases. The immigration judge granted the motion, and both Mr. A's case and Mrs. A's case were terminated! Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Malik.
Mr. Mathur successfully withdrew Mr. V's plea in criminal court, which wiped out his previous criminal record - the courthouse and jail neglected to release Mr. V from jail or to transfer him to immigration. Ms. Malik followed up on Mr. V's detention. She corresponded with three departments in the Sheriff's Department, advising them of imminent suit to follow if Mr. V was not released. She also prepared and sent correspondence to the Department of Homeland Security, requesting Mr. V's release once in immigration custody. Within the same week, Mr. V was released from criminal jail, transferred to immigration, and then immediately released again without bond! Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Malik.
Ms. N. Was arrested for theft and detained by immigration. Ms. Malik immediately compiled evidence necessary to request a release without bond from immigration and she was successful! Ms. Malik continued to work on the criminal case and ultimately got the case dismissed, resulting in no conviction for Ms. N. Once the criminal case was disposed of, Ms. Wahab worked hard to prepare a Deferred Action Request on Ms. N's behalf. This petition was approved, and Ms. N now has work authorization and a driver's license. Result by Ms. Wahab and Ms. Malik.
Mr. H hired our firm to file for a divorce action against his wife for 20 years. Mr. H wanted fair settlement of his property and wanted to keep all stocks, shares, bank and retirement accounts. Ms. Sinha successfully mediated the case under Mr. Mathur's supervision to achieve Mr. H's goals. Mr. H was awarded all his stock and shares along with his bank and retirement accounts and a share of all community assets. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mrs. S came to our office when she was placed in removal proceedings. The basis was that USCIS had revoked her petition filed by her U.S. Citizen spouse. Mr. Mathur interviewed her and prepared her case to re-file the petition and appeal the prior denial. Mr. Mathur also suggested the re-filing of her adjustment application. When the case reached the court, Mr. Mathur explained that the case should be dismissed and sent back to USCIS for further adjudication, the prosecution agreed. USCIS later re-interviewed Ms. S and her spouse, with Mr. Mathur's attendance, USCIS made a decision to approve the case within a week of the interview. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mr. D's wife retained our firm after meeting with Mr. Mathur. When Mr. D was arrested for Felony Aggravated Theft, his bond was set at $100,000 and he was placed under an immigration detainer. The detainer would prevent Mr. D's family from posting bond through a bond company and would also prevent Mr. D from being immediately released once the $100,000 was posted in cash; he would instead be transferred to immigration. Mr. Mathur set forth a plan to handle Mr. D's case and Ms. Malik immediately went to the Department of Homeland Security to discuss removal of the immigration hold, and then went to the courthouse to request a hearing on a bond reduction. Through her correspondence with immigration officers and with the criminal prosecutors, and after a hearing before a criminal judge, Mr. D's bond was reduced to $15,000 and the immigration detainer was removed! Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Malik.
Mr. A was arrested for theft and placed into immigration removal proceedings. Mr. Mathur outlined a plan to handle the case. Relief was asserted before the judge based on his criminal history and ties to the United States. Prior to the hearing on relief taking place, Mr. A was cited for another theft offense. A conviction with this theft offense would cause Mr. A to be immediately ineligible for the relief sought before the court. Mr. Mathur and Ms. Malik were working on the immigration case, and knew the effects this new criminal offense would have on it. Under Mr. Mathur's supervision, Ms. Malik went to two court settings and had the offense changed to Disorderly Conduct, which would not affect his immigration status or relief. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Malik.
Mr. K was arrested for Sale of Alcohol to a Minor. Though he had a strong defense, the prosecutors were initially unwilling to dismiss the case. It was important that Mr. K not receive a conviction on this offense as it would be detrimental to his student visa status. The case was set for trial. Prior to the trial date, the prosecutor emailed Ms. Malik and stated they would be dismissing the charges. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Malik.
Mr. V's family hired the firm when he was arrested for the felony offense of Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon. His bond was set at $10,000, which due to his immigration status, would have to be paid in full in cash. Ms. Malik immediately compiled sufficient evidence to request a lower bond from the criminal judge and moved for a hearing before the court. Mr. V's bond was reduced to $5,000! Result by Ms. Malik.
Mr. P was arrested for Felony Assault Family Violence. On an employment visa, such a conviction was sure to make him deportable. Ms. Malik and Mr. Mathur researched possible ways to mitigate the immigration consequences of such a conviction. Ms. Malik met with the prosecution several times to discuss these consequences. Based on his conversations with Ms. Malik, the prosecutor agreed to reduce the felony offense to a misdemeanor offense without a finding of family violence. Result by Ms. Malik and Mr. Mathur.
Mr. F's fiancé hired Mr. Mathur when he was detained for multiple traffic tickets, a warrant for possession of marijuana, a new offense for possession of marijuana. Mr. Mathur outlined a plan for handling the case. Ms. Malik posted bond for Mr. F and contacted the Department of Homeland Security to ensure his immediate release. Mr. F. was released from immigration without needing to post bond. Ms. Malik continued to work throughout the year on the two pending criminal cases, ultimately getting one case dismissed and a short deferred probation on the second. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Malik.
Ms. T. Hired the firm after she had been arrested for Felony Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon. Mr. Mathur and Ms. Malik contacted the District Attorney's office and quickly began working on the case. The felony was reduced to a misdemeanor. Ms. Malik reached an agreement with the prosecution, whereby the misdemeanor was ultimately dismissed, resulting in no conviction for Ms. T. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Malik.
Mr. D came to office to file for his naturalization. It was discovered during the consultation that Mr. D has a theft on his record. However, due to the age of theft and the amount, Mr. Mathur advised that he could still get the naturalization approved with argument that it was a small crime that occurred years ago. The case was handed to Ms. Sinha with specific instructions, the case was approved by USCIS. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. B. was charged with Assault Family Violence. Mr. B came to see Mr. Mathur who advised him that this charge could result in deportation. Mr. Mathur further advised how he and his team would work on getting the case dismissed. Mr. Mathur and Ms. Malik worked on this dismissal of the case and Mr. B no longer has to worry about being deported for the offense! Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Malik.
Ms. R, from Honduras, entered US without inspection and married a permanent residence. Within a year of marriage, her spouse started abusing her and Ms. R's marriage started falling apart due to spousal abuse, violence, and adultery. Ms. R came to Mr. Mathur. Mr. Mathur advised Ms. R to seek a divorce and collect evidence in the divorce of the husband's misconduct. Ms. Sinha worked on the case under Mr. Mathur's supervision and collected all evidence of abuse. The divorce was granted. Ms. Sinha convincingly argued that Ms. R was a victim of abuse and filed a Violence Against Women's Act petition. Ms. R's Violence Against Women's Act petition was approved. Ms. R is now eligible to become a permanent resident. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. V's wife hired Mr. Mathur when her husband was arrested for a DWI and detained by ICE. Mr. Mathur noted that Mr. V had been removed before. Mr. Mathur drafted correspondence to ICE regarding his relief. Mr. V faced imminent deportation due to his immigration history. Ms. Malik quickly acted and was able to not only get Mr. V released from immigration without being deported, but his DWI case was dismissed as well! Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Malik.
Mr. R consulted with Mathur Law Offices, P.C. after his naturalization case was denied twice when filed by another law firm. Ms. Sinha advised Mr. R to re-file the petition with medical disability waiver as Mr. R had difficulty memorizing and remembering things. Ms. Sinha prepared the case under Mr. Mathur's supervision and obtained all the required evaluations and reports. Ms. Sinha took Mr. R for the interview at USCIS and explained Mr. R's medical condition to the officer. Based on the documents, memorandum and explanation provided by Ms. Sinha the case was approved. Mr. R attended the oath ceremony and became a United States Citizen last month. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. M's family came to Mr. Mathur when their son was in removal proceedings. Mr. M came to the United States as a young boy and had been here all his life. One day, he was accused of being involved in an armed robbery where a lady alleged that she had been shot and chased in her vehicle. Mr. hired another lawyer who pleaded him guilty. Mr. M had no chance of staying in the U.S. with this conviction. Mr. Mathur and Mr. Stevenson filed a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the criminal court to withdraw the guilty plea. After a hearing with Mr. Mathur, the Judge agreed to withdraw the plea. Mr. Mathur and Ms. Malik then filed a Motion to Reopen the removal case with the immigration court based on the new evidence that the Writ was granted and the plea vacated. The BIA agreed and reopened the case! Result by Mr. Mathur, Mr. Stevenson and Ms. Malik.
Mr. C came to Mathur Law Offices, P.C. because he was afraid that he would be removed from the United States after his conviction. Mathur Law Offices found a way to prove that Mr. C was a citizen and filed the application with USCIS. USCIS agreed that Mr. C was a citizen and approved his application despite his incarceration. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. D hired Mathur Law Offices, P.C. when his Removal of Conditions application was denied. Mr. Mathur advised on getting the case reopened. Ms. Sinha worked on gathering all the documents and evidence and got the case reopened with USCIS in a month. Thereafter, Mr. D was issued a Notice of Intent to Deny. USCIS pointed to discrepancies in facts and inconsistencies during the interview regarding bona fide marriage. Ms. Sinha refuted these reasons with pertinent evidence. Mr. D's NOID was reversed and he was granted Permanent Resident Status. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Our client, Mr. F., came to our office with a deportation order from years ago. Mr. F. had failed to show for Court and the Judge Ordered him deported in his absence. Mr. F. was particularly concerned because he could not renew his professional license and could be deported at any time. Our client is married with young children. After reviewing the facts carefully, preparation was done to approve a new visa application and then move the court to reopen the case. The motion to reopen was granted and our client will now apply for his resident alien card. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Humble.
Our client entered the U.S. illegally years ago. She married a U.S. citizen with whom she has two children. Because she entered without a visa illegally, she was not eligible to file for her papers in the U.S. We filed her application for processing in Mexico and requested that her illegal presence be forgiven based on hardship to her family. The Department of State granted the waiver and our client has been admitted to the U.S. as a lawful permanent resident. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Our client entered the U.S. illegally years ago. She married a U.S. citizen with whom she has two children. Because she entered without a visa illegally, she was not eligible to file for her papers in the U.S. We filed her application for processing in Mexico and requested that her illegal presence be forgiven based on hardship to her family. The Department of State granted the waiver and our client has been admitted to the U.S. as a lawful permanent resident. Result by Mr. Mathur.
The Department of State (DOS) in Nigeria denied our client a K3 spouse visa because they disbelieved the validity of the marriage. Due to overriding fraud issues, the DOS post in Nigeria can be very tough. After retaining our firm, we proved the validity of the relationship by extensive evidence and persuasion. The DOS changed their opinion and approved the spousal visa. Result by Mr. Humble and Ms. Wahab.
Our firm represents several international companies who all rely on us to stay competitive in a slow global economy. Today’s challenges of getting visas approved and showing necessity for international companies to get foreign executives over here is especially challenging. Nevertheless, we were able to get one of our long time client’s work visas approved in only four days. Result by Mr. Mathur, Ms. Wahab and Mr. Humble.
After several bouts with other attorneys, a local technology company entrusted Mathur Law Offices, P.C., with its H1B visas and labor certification. In today’s economy getting these applications approved for small to medium sized companies is difficult. Nevertheless, we were able to turn around the denial trend the client had been facing and get both an H1B approved as well as a Labor Certification Application filed with the Department of Labor. Result by Ms. Wahab, Mr. Humble and Mr. Mathur.
Over eight years ago, when she was a minor, Mrs. G entered the USA without inspection. Now she and her U.S. citizen husband have three children, all under the age of 5. Because of the unlawful entry, however, Mrs. G couldn’t get a green card inside the USA. We helped her with consular processing and a waiver application. The American Consulate in Mexico interviewed her early in June of 2009. Two months later, her waiver was approved and she was reunited with her family in Texas! Result by Mr. Humble.
Mr. D timely applied for a change of status (COS) from H1 worker to F1 student. The school, however, inadvertently chose a program start date that was more than 4 months after his H1 expiration date. Because of this time gap, CIS denied the COS. We helped Mr. D appeal, based upon extraordinary circumstances beyond Mr. D’s control. CIS agreed, reopened the case, and approved the COS. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mrs. C’s employer, a company with hotels in the USA and in India, hired Mathur Law Offices, P.C. to help prepare and file a petition for immigrant visas for Mrs. C, and her husband and two children. The USCIS denied the petition, alleging that the employer failed to explain Mrs. C’s job duties abroad. We also helped the company appeal, proving that Mrs. C’s performance meets the definition of “executive capacity” and/or “managerial capacity” under 8 C.F.R. 204.5(j)(2). USCIS agreed with us, and approved the petition. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Humble.
Ms. A is a citizen of Guatemala. During her trial in immigration court she argued that she could not be returned to Guatemala due to domestic violence she had suffered and would continue to be victimized by. She filed an Asylum claim. The Immigration Judge denied the case on legal eligibility to make the claim. The case was appealed by our office to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). The BIA agreed that the Immigration Judge’s decision should not stand and has now sent the case back to be re-heard. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Hussami.
Mr. H, a citizen of the USA, hired our office to help his wife through consular processing with a waiver application. She was not eligible to adjust inside the USA, so she had to appear at the American Consulate in Mexico in April of 2009. She was subject to the 10-year bar for having accumulated unlawful presence in the USA. We helped her apply for a waiver. In June the waiver was granted and her immigrant visa approved! Result by Mr. Humble.
Mr. D was convicted of four felony drug convictions arising out of offenses in the State of California. Although, the law allows for these offenses to be grounds for removal, we advised our client that we believed we could get his naturalization approved. This advice was based on our knowledge that naturalization laws differ from removal laws. Although we expected a fight by the administration, we able to get the case approved on the first interview with USCIS. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Nineteen-year-old Mr. S has lived in the USA since age 10 when he and his family entered as tourists. They fled El Salvador due to threats against Mr. S’ father, a former military officer. His parents have Temporary Protected Status, but Mr. S was in danger of being sent back to El Salvador. He was afraid because his cousin in El Salvador received anonymous threats: if you don’t tell us how to find Mr. S’ father in the USA, we’ll kill you. Sadly, in April of 2009 the cousin was shot to death. The Immigration Judge was convinced that Mr. S’ fear of persecution on account of imputed political opinion was well founded, and so granted asylum. Result by Mr. Humble.
Mr. M married in 2007 and welcomed into his life both his new wife and two stepdaughters. In May of 2008 we helped this family of four submit immigrant visa petitions and adjustment resident admission applications. Nine months later, the CIS approved their cases. If Mrs. M naturalizes, approximately three years in the future, her daughters will gain derivative citizenship automatically. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Humble.
A trucking company in Central America opened offices in the USA, transporting loads for Kellog, Sherman Williams Paints, Colgate-Palmolive and other to Wal-Mart, etc. We previously helped the corporation obtain an intra-company transferee “L” visa for a vice president, Mr. B. This year we helped the corporation apply for Mr. B and his wife’s immigrant visas (green cards). The CIS approved the petition in less than two months! Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Humble.
Tough times tighten the market for skilled workers. A small technology company needed a Senior Software Engineer, and they found the right person for the job in Mr. K of India. But Mr. K needed a petition to transfer his H-1B visa. We helped the company file the transfer petition, and the CIS approved it just thirteen days later! Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Humble.
Our client was denied naturalization when appeared without a lawyer. He was denied because he had four minor traffic violations. Alarmed by the incorrectness of the decision, we immediately persuaded our client not to stand for this abuse of discretion. We appealed the case and the immigration service agreed that the decision was wrong and reversed their own decision, thereby granting our client's naturalization. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Ms. C was arrested by immigration officials after losing her case with other attorney representation. She had not left the U.S. after being ordered deported. After her arrest, her family hired Mathur Law Offices, P.C., After review the case Mr. Mathur determined that an “out of time motion to reopen” could be filed due to changed country conditions. The facts showed that anti-opposition forces burned down Ms. C’s house in Zimbabwe early in 2008. Later in 2008 U.S. immigration officials took Ms. C into custody to deport her back there. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) was persuaded by evidence of the destruction of the family home and the State Department’s human rights report of politically motivated kid-napping, torture, and murder. Ms. C’s case was reopened and she was release from custody. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Humble.
Our client applied for voluntary departure from the U.S. The immigration judge denied his request citing convictions and allegations for criminal offenses over one year old. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), agreed that the immigration judge was wrong. The BIA sent the case back to the judge to allow for the voluntary departure to be granted. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mr. G represented himself without a lawyer beforethe Immigration Judge (IJ) in Houston, but lost his case. His family hired Mathur Law Offices, P.C. in Dallas to help him appeal. We filed a legal brief, arguing how the DHS and the IJ failed on a key point that could save Mr. G’s case. Mr. G has had a green card for many years. His wife is a U.S. citizen, and he has six minor U.S. citizen children. He might be eligible for a waiver. The Board of Immigration Appeals agreed with us, and ordered the case remanded to the IJ. Mr. G will get a second chance! Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Humble.
Mr. M had failed to disclose on his petition to remove conditions from his green card that he had a criminal conviction. He mistakenly thought the conviction didn’t “count” for immigration purposes since, years ago, the criminal court judge had said it didn’t count for purposes of employment, leasing an apartment, etc. We helped Mr. M apply for U.S. citizenship, fully disclosing his conviction, and arguing that he had good moral character over the last five years. CIS was persuaded, and approved his naturalization application! Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Humble.
Nearly 20 years ago, Mr. A filed an immigrant visa petition for his brother. After decades of waiting, the case seemed to be faltering. We communicated with the National Visa Center and the American Consulate in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, to resolve various issues. Finally, Mr. A’s brother, sister-in-law, and their minor children were all granted green cards! Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Humble.
Our client was first placed in deportation because of a domestic violence conviction. Our client was previously represented by another immigration firm in town. Due to mis-communication between the client and his old law firm, the client failed to show for Court and was ordered deported. Our client was arrested by immigration and was about to be put on a bus to Mexico. We contacted the lead lawyers for immigration and detention and removal to have the client released while we tried to reopen the case. We argued to immigration that the basis for deportation was invalid due to a change in the law. Immigration agreed to reopen the case and let our client go. Once the case was reopened in court, we move to dismiss the case and get our client’s residency back. The immigration judge agreed and dismissed the case and the client has got his resident alien status restored. Result by Mr. Mathur.
The kitchen knife in Mrs. V’s carry-on bag was accidentally put there in haste, as she and her husband were moving from New York to Texas. Airport security stopped them. Mr. V took responsibility for it, and was fined. His past also included some traffic tickets. Would this hurt his application for U.S. citizenship? Mr. Mathur advised them about the regulations relating to good moral character, 8 CFR 316.10(a)(2), which take into account the elements enumerated and the “standards of the average citizen in the community of residence.” Four months later, a CIS District Adjudications Officer approved Mr. V’s case. Turns out, the officer himself had also been stopped for having a carry-on bag with a knife! Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Humble.
Our client had a deportation case based on hardship to his children. Our client had been illegal for over ten years but in his trial he attempted to show that he was a person of good character and that exceptional hardship would occur to his U.S. citizen daughter if he was not allowed to stay. Due to his failure to pay taxes each year, the Immigration Judge asserted, using strong words, that he would never allow the client to stay. The case was appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). The BIA agreed that the IJ was unfair and that did not give our client a fair hearing. The BIA reversed the IJ’s decision and ordered that the case be sent back to be re-tried before a new Immigration Judge. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Hussami.
Mr. L was denied citizenship in October 2008. USCIS denied based on lack of good moral character, citing five traffic violations including several for driving with a license invalid. We argued that these violations had no basis for a denial based on moral character as they were not crimes involving moral turpitude. Moreover, that many people in society of good moral character are cited for multiple violations of traffic laws. After the administrative appeal was heard, USCIS withdrew their original decision to deny the case and approved our client’s citizenship. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Humble.
Our client was put in deportation proceedings for felony theft. The case involved the professional sports jerseys. The case was in the local news media. After months of working with prosecutors on the case, we were able to get his felony case reduced to a “petty offense” as defined by immigration law. Through this criminal felony to misdemeanor reduction, we were also able to file for his immigration status without issues to his admissibility. We used an old petition filed by his uncle to his mother to allow for the paperwork to be filed in immigration court. We convinced the immigration judge that our client’s visa petition filed by his wife, in conjunction with his uncle’s old petition and the misdemeanor reduction allowed our client to get his residency in the U.S. The immigration judge agreed and our client was admitted to the U.S. as a resident rather than being deported. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mrs. J was ordered removed on June 13, 2006, because she failed to appear at the Immigration Court. She was unaware of the appointment, as the Notice of Hearing was mailed to her old address. The envelope bearing the “not deliverable” sticker of the United States Postal Service (USPS) was inside the folder of the Immigration Judge (IJ), yet the IJ denied our Motion to Reopen. We timely appealed and the Board of Immigration Appeals ordered the IJ to take another look at this case. Mrs. J was released from DHS custody, as the litigation is ongoing. Result by Mr. Mathur & Mr. Humble.
Our client was placed in removal proceedings after returning to the U.S. Her case history showed multiple arrests and convictions for theft, larceny, grand larceny. These convictions occurred in several jurisdictions. We tried the immigration case and the judge granted our client’s permission to remain in the U.S. After restoring her resident status, we immediately filed for her naturalization. After less than one year, her naturalization case was approved and she is now a U.S. Citizen. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Our client attended an immigration interview and stated that she did not desire to bear arms on behalf of the U.S. Government. Although required to understand English, we believed her statement was made due to an error in understanding what the question was. We filed an appeal. After submitting evidence that controverted the initial decision, USCIS overturned their own decision and granted our client citizenship.
Last year we helped Mrs. H file a Form I-751 petition to remove the conditions on her status as a Lawful Permanent Resident. She immigrated through good-faith marriage, but that marriage later terminated in divorce. The CIS approved our client’s petition, for both her and her minor daughter, a derivative beneficiary who adjusted concurrently. Mrs. H’s son, however, has his own separate I-751 since he immigrated via the follow-to-join consular process. Two down, one to go! Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Humble.
Mrs. R is the wife of a U.S. citizen, and they have two U.S.-born children. But in 1996, due to a work-site raid, she was taken by bus from Euless to Mexico. In 1999 she was admitted with a border-crossing card, and never left the USA. In the summer of 2008 we helped our client apply for Adjustment of Status. Eight months later her residency was approved. Result by Mr. Humble.
In November of 2008 Mr. C passed the examination for U.S. citizenship, except for the English language portion. The CIS officer gave him a second chance, on January 26, 2009. On that date, the officer approved our client’s case, and gave him an Oath Ceremony appointment for that very afternoon! Result by Mr. Humble.
In 1993, Mrs. A’s then husband (now ex-husband) set her up. He sent her shopping with a “friend.” Although the criminal court judge deferred any adjudication of guilt, for immigration and naturalization purposes it still counts as a conviction. We helped our client show CIS that she meets the requirement of good moral character, and her naturalization application was approved. Result by Mr. Humble.
In November of 2008 Mr. C passed the examination for U.S. citizenship, except for the English language portion. The CIS officer gave him a second chance, on January 26, 2009. On that date, the officer approved our client’s case, and gave him an Oath Ceremony appointment for that very afternoon! Result by Mr. Humble.
Mr. H and his U.S. citizen wife were given custody of a baby boy by CPS and they planned to adopt him, but first Mr. H had to apply to DHS for a waiver of inadmissibility. He had entered the USA without inspection, was not “grandfathered” by Section 245(i), and had accumulated more than a year of unlawful presence. At the end of 2007 he was interviewed at the American Consulate in Mexico. We helped our client prove that denial of his case would cause his wife extreme hardship. A year later, the DHS agreed and granted his immigrant visa. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Our client’s spouse was suddenly ordered deployed by the U.S. military to Italy. They couple had already shipped their possessions and purchased airfare. On 12/08/08 we requested an emergency Adjustment interview. Three days later, a CIS officer called to set it up, and the next day Mrs. H’s case was approved, enabling the couple to stay together. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Humble.
Our client was once in danger due to overstaying his tourist status and the requirement of Special Registration. With our help, his status was adjusted to Lawful Permanent Resident. That prior success has now culminated in the grant of U.S. citizenship, despite multiple recent traffic violations. The examiner stated that Question 16 – “Have you ever been arrested, cited or detained by any law enforcement officer (including CIS or former INS and military officers) for any reason?” – includes mere traffic citations. From the date of applying for naturalization to the date of the citizenship oath ceremony was only 81 days! Result by Mr. Humble.
Our client married his wife in deportation proceedings. His claim was that he could stay in the U.S. and adjust his status through his spouse. After being in immigration court, our client was later charged with a felony theft offense in Tarrant County, Texas. The immigration judge refused to allow our client time to have his visa approved and continue his case. An appeal was taken of the judge’s decision. During the pendency of the appeal, we fought the felony theft and had it reduced to a misdemeanor. The ultimate conviction fell under the petty offense exception under immigration law. We showed the appeals court that our client was “admissible” to the U.S., his marriage to his wife was bona fide and that the immigration judge was wrong in not continuing the case. The appeals court agreed and GRANTED the motion to reopen and has sent the case back to the immigration judge. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Our client married his wife in deportation proceedings. His claim was that he could stay in the U.S. and adjust his status through his spouse. After being in immigration court, our client was later charged with a felony theft offense in Tarrant County, Texas. The immigration judge refused to allow our client time to have his visa approved and continue his case. An appeal was taken of the judge’s decision. During the pendency of the appeal, we fought the felony theft and had it reduced to a misdemeanor. The ultimate conviction fell under the petty offense exception under immigration law. We showed the appeals court that our client was “admissible” to the U.S., his marriage to his wife was bona fide and that the immigration judge was wrong in not continuing the case. The appeals court agreed and GRANTED the motion to reopen and has sent the case back to the immigration judge. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Our client was represented by a competing large immigration firm with offices in Dallas, Houston, Chicago and Austin. The firm has several Associate Attorneys. The client believed that the representation she had with this firm was ineffective. One of the firm’s attorneys reportedly advised her to withdraw her case before the judge, resulting in her voluntary deportation on her trial date. After doing so, she felt that this advice was wrong and came to our firm to reopen the case. We filed the motion to reopen with the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) based on ineffective assistance of counsel. The BIA GRANTED the motion and our client’s case is now back open for her fight to stay.
Our client was arrested on an old order of removal/deportation. When our client’s family came to us they only knew that our client was arrested by ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) and was being scheduled for deportation. We investigated the case and found that our client had failed to show-up for a immigration court proceeding in Louisiana about two years ago. We filed a motion to reopen the case with the court in Louisiana. Despite being technically out of time in filing the motion, the Court GRANTED the motion based on the re-marriage because we proved that immigration had failed to update our client’s address when they sent him notice of court. After the case was reopened, we file and application for bond redetermination before the Immigration Court in Dallas, Texas. Bond was granted and our client has been released and is no longer scheduled for deportation. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Our client was put was served with notice to appear in immigration court. The deportation papers stated that she had procured an immigration benefit by fraud. Specifically, it alleged, that she had made misrepresentations to gain a visitor visa. After investigating the case, we found that the government had failed to properly file the case in court. We filed applications to adjust our client status with a waiver of inadmissibility with USCIS. The waiver and permanent resident card applications were both granted, thereby, providing her permanent status in the United States.
Our client was stopped for a routine traffic violation. After the local officer realized that our client was not legally present in the United States, he requested Immigration and Customs Enforcement place a hold on him. After hiring our firm, we were able to have our client released. Thereafter, we found that he had been here over ten (10) years and had a U.S. Citizen child. We also had evidence that the child suffered from Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). We set the case for trial before an immigration judge to prove that our client’s child would suffer “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” if our client was not able to stay. The immigration judge agreed and our client was granted permanent residency. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Our client had a federal conviction for a conspiracy to conduct a financial transaction affecting interstate commerce. After this was initially discovered, the client was put in removal proceedings. After winning the removal proceedings based on a trial relating to extreme hardship if removal was executed, our firm then filed our client's naturalization application. Our argument that good moral character requirement had been overcome worked. Now, our client went from deportation/removal to having his citizenship approved.
Our client, a Canadian, was married to a US Citizen many years ago. After filing immigration paperwork through her husband and having residency granted on a conditional basis, she later divorced. Not realizing that she needed to remove the conditions, she later re-married and then did not attend to her expired status. After many years, she left to go to Canada on vacation. Upon leaving she triggered a legal bar to re-admission under 212(a)(9)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Officers at the border allowed her to seek inspection in Dallas, Texas. After many complications, it was determined that she was subject to a ten (10) year bar. There was also the obstacle of allowing her legally back in so that she could file residency applications before the immigration judge. After a long effort by our office, we were able to get the border patrol to allow her in legally and get the immigration judge to waive the ten (10) year bar based on hardship to her family. The immigration judge also granted her permanent resident status based on her marriage to her second husband. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Client hired our firm after his application for NACARA and asylum had been denied. Client's case was later heard by an Immigration Judge in Dallas, Texas. The case was denied as the client suffered a criminal background. Client had two cases in California and one in Texas. On appeal it was argued that the Immigration Judge did not clarify his decision as regards the asylum. The appeal's court, Board of Immigration Appeals, agreed and sent the case back to the Immigration Judge. Once the case was back in the immigration court, it was argued that the criminal cases in California had now been dismissed as the client had rectified those cases. Further, that the criminal case in Texas did not make our client ineligible for NACARA, as it fell within the petty offense exception. The opposing counsel for Department of Homeland Security and the Immigration Judge agreed. About two and one-half years later, our client was given NACARA relief and adjusted to a permanent resident by the Immigration Judge.
Client was put in deportation proceedings after another firm had tried to get him residency and submitted the wrong applications to immigration. In the mean time, client was arrested and charged with credit card abuse. Client was convicted of two counts of credit card abuse to which he pleaded guilty with another firm. Once our firm got the case, we re-filed the appropriate immigration paperwork and requested that the immigration judge allow time for that paperwork to get approved. After the paperwork was approved the immigration judge was advised about the credit card abuse charges and the case was submitted to the judge for a hardship waiver. Our client’s waiver was GRANTED and he received his permanent residency before the immigration judge. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Our client was put in deportation proceedings when he filed for citizenship on his own. The application revealed that our client did not tell immigration that he was arrested for prostitution when applying for a resident alien status. The citizenship case was denied and the client was put in deportation proceedings. Our firm argued that the client was not subject to deportation because even though he did not disclose the information on his application and had been arrested twice for prostitution, the convictions were not subject to immigration law penalties. The judge granted our motion to dismiss the deportation case. Result by Mr. Mathur.
After being denied based on marriage fraud, our client came to our office in desperate need. His current U.S. citizen wife who he shared children with had her petition for his visa denied. The basis was that USCIS stated that his prior marriage had been entered into for purposes of evading immigration laws. As such, they could deny the new marriage due to a penalty provision in the law. Our client was put in removal proceedings, at trial it was shown that USCIS had made their decision in error. The finding of fraud was not founded in fact or in law. The immigration judge overturned the USCIS finding and approved the application for residency filed for our client. Result by Mr. Mathur
Client had been placed in proceedings after a NACARA application was denied. Client applied for withholding and asylum. The immigration judge incorrectly denied the application. The case was taken on appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). The BIA found that the immigration judge had erred in his decision and remanded the case back to the Court. Result by Mr. Mathur
Client came to our firm after he had been deported over seven (7) years ago. Our client had failed to leave the United States per the order of removal and basically tried to forget about the whole case. After years of worrying and seeing his family grow, our client came to us for help to see if his case could be reopened. Although it took about 2 years of litigation, the case was finally reopened by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). Result by Mr. Mathur.
Client married to a United States Citizen had conviction for domestic violence against his wife. Generally, the USCIS offices deny adjustments of status when there has been domestic violence against the petitioner spouse. Client had been told by several lawyers that his case would not be approved and he would be deported. Mr. Mathur agreed to take the case since the firm has been so successful at obtaining waiver. After adjustments of status and appropriate waiver/evidence was filed, the case was argued to USCIS. The waiver was GRANTED by the Houston District Director and client’s is now a lawful permanent resident.
Client came to our office with pending deportation/removal in Miami. She was in removal proceedings because she had committed fraud. The basis of the fraud was false marriage to a United States Citizen. While still married to husband number one, she married another husband number two. Our firm, transferred her deportation case to Dallas, Texas. Divorced her first husband, rectified the marriage to the second husband through family court proceedings. Then, we obtained significant delays in the immigration court to allow her second husband to become a United States Citizen. After his citizenship, we upgraded the visa petition for her and her visa as his wife approved. Lastly, we filed a waiver of inadmissibility in the immigration courts and had a trial. On trial she had to show extreme hardship to a parent child or spouse to be able to get her resident status and not be deported. Result, trial won and client obtained lawful permanent resident status. Trial Results by Mr. Azhar.
At the airport a woman with a B1/B2 Visa was being denied admission for allegedly overstaying on a prior entry. Although there was a prior overstay, it was argued that it was waived by subsequent entry and extension. Client was admitted for 6 months. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Two U.S. resident clients who had been several times. One spouse arrested and convicted thirteen (13) times for larceny, theft, grand larceny, result – deportation trial won, clients’s residency is restored. Clients are now apply for naturalization. Result by Mr. Mathur.
USICE - drops deportation case wherein client convicted of a violation of protective order. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Client was arrested by USICE for allegedly transporting an illegal alien. Client was illegal in the U.S. for over ten years. Client won his resident card and status based on good moral character, ten years of illegal presence and extreme and unusual hardship that would have resulted to his daughter if he were deported. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Same case as above, client was put in deportation/removal proceedings as a result of being arrested for hit and run. Client had been in the U.S. for over ten years, she had eight U.S. citizen children and since she had not been convicted of the case above, she had good moral character. Client won her resident card based on these facts and extreme and unusual hardship to her U.S. Citizen children. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Client from Bangladesh had registered for “special registration” and as a result was placed in removal. Mr. Mathur filed for residency based on 10 years of physical presence, good moral character and extreme and unusual hardship to U.S. citizen children, both client and his wife were GRANTED residency. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Client applied for Asylum, Withholding, Convention Against Torture based on converting to Christianity from Islam. Client was from Iran and application was made over one year after being present in the U.S. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Client pleaded guilty to two counts of burglary of a vehicle with 360 days punishment in jail. A writ of habeas corpus was filed in the criminal court to reverse the plea of guilt. The writ was GRANTED and the pleas were undone. The criminal cases were subsequently reduced and the immigration case won by Mr. Mathur based on extreme hardship and eligibility for cancellation of removal as the criminal cases were no longer “Aggravated Felonies” under the immigration laws. Result on both criminal and deportation by Mr. Mathur.
Mr. W came to Mr. Mathur after being referred by an affluent friend in the Dallas community. Mr. W was wrongly charged with an assault. After seeking discovery and subpoenas related to video surveillance, Mr. Mathur was able to prove that Mr. W never assaulted. After having the assault case dismissed, Mr. W hired Mr. Mathur to sue the complainant for malicious prosecution. Mr. Mathur and Mr. Reese settled the case on a confidential basis. Mr. W feels fully vindicated. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Reese.
Mr. A hired Mr. Mathur when he was getting deported for a serious criminal charge. Mr. Mathur won his case in removal court. After winning the removal, Mr. Mathur turned to Mr. A's naturalization and fought and won his naturalization. Mr. A is now a U.S. citizen! Result by Mr. Mathur.
Ms. G hired Mr. Mathur when she was in removal for serious drug charges. First, Mr. Mathur reversed the criminal cases that would exclude her from immigration relief. Second, Mr. Mathur won her removal case. Third, Mr. Mathur went back to get her records erased. All won and record cleaned! Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mr. B’s family hired the Mathur Law Offices when he was oppressed with a $100,000.00 bond on a first-time felony offense. Realizing that this bond amount was exorbitant and that the client, who is an undocumented immigrant, required help, the Mathur team investigated the background and filed a pre-indictment Writ to reduce the bond. At the hearing, the Judge advised that the argument and presentation were “wonderful” and reduced the bond by $50,000.00. Result by Mr. Nieto, Ms. Ball, and Mr. Mathur.
Mr. S could not get convicted of Assault family violence. He would lose everything he worked for. He trusted the Mathur Law Team who worked on all the weaknesses of the case. Ultimately, the case was dismissed! Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. De La Garza.
Ms. S cam to Mathur Law Offices after being arrested for Assault against a family member. The firm worked hard to prove to the prosecution that there was no evidence to support the case. The case was rejected. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. De La Garza.
Ms. N had used another lawyer to help her with her criminal case and immigration situation. The other local lawyer totally messed up her case when she pleaded Ms. N guilty to a felony theft case. Mr. Mathur spotted the ineffective assistance and filed post-conviction relief to reverse the criminal case. After winning the post-conviction relief, Mr. Mathur moved to have Ms. N's records expunged. After the records were expunged, Mr. Mathur moved to have Ms. N's naturalization as a U.S. citizen granted, which it finally was. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mr. K came to Mathur Law Offices as a referral from community members. Mr. K had a same sex partner who shared his apartment. One night the accusation was that the partner was home, and Mr. K returned to ask him to leave. The partner called the police and accused Mr. K of violently assaulting him. While there were severe medical injuries and photos to reflect, the Mathur team realized there are two sides to every story and that photos and medicals alone do not tell the whole tale. After further investigating the case, the Mathur team set forth a written argument before the Dallas County Grand Jury to dismiss the case. After review, Grand Jury agreed and “No Billed” or dismissed the case. Result by Mr. Nieto and Mr. Mathur.
Mr. R came to Mathur Law Offices to obtain a divorce. Once we heard Mr. R's story, determined he might be eligible for an annulment due to religious reasons. The opposing party was dodging service and using delay tactics. The firm collected affidavits to present to the Judge and were able to get the opposing party served via substituted service. At trial, Mr. Reese convinced the Judge through eliciting Mr. R's testimony, that the annulment should be granted, that all property should be declared Mr. P's separate property including both residences, all furnishing, bank accounts, future bonuses, all retirement accounts and jewelry that a judgment for attorney's fees, as well as an permanent injunction against the opposing party from coming near Mr. P, contacting Mr. P by any means, and preventing the opposing side from coming within 500 feet of any of Mr. P's properties that he owns now or may own in the future. Result by Mr. Reese and Mr. Mathur
Mr. B's family originally met and hired Mr. Mathur in 2014. At the time, Mr. B had been charged with a serious federal offense in the United States District Court - Western District of Texas. Despite Mr. B being an undocumented alien, Mr. Mathur requested the federal judge release Mr. B. A hearing in West Texas was conducted, and Mr. Mathur personally flew out and handled the hearing. Mr. B was released from the Court and placed in removal proceedings. Mr. Mathur was able to get the federal case reduced to a minor offense with no additional incarceration. Mr. Mathur then argued to the Immigration Judge that the offense did not stand as a consequence of immigration, and Mr. B was released from all custody. Mr. Mathur then defended an additional allegation with success. Mr. B's case was pending with the immigration court for years. Mr. Zumberg worked on the immigration case and sought to have it dismissed. Because of the lack of severe criminal history, the government agreed to dismiss the case. Result by Mr. Zumberg and Mr. Mathur.
Mr. CC came to the Mathur Law Offices in desperate need of criminal defense help. Mr. CC’s ex had accused him of coming into her apartment and committing family violence to the degree of a felony. Mr. CC’s daughter was one of the witnesses against him and reported the eyewitness account to the police. Mr. CC is a resident and, as such, could not take the punishment of any kind as it would lead to removal proceedings. After months of negotiations, the prosecution would not drop the case. Mr. Mathur reviewed the discovery to prepare for trial. Mr. Mathur pointed out the weaknesses. Ms. Wayne worked on the prosecution to the point of exhaustion. Finally, the prosecution dismissed the case outright. Results by Ms. Wayne and Mr. Mathur.
Ms. M came to see Mr. Mathur after being arrested and charged for Felony Tampering with Government Documents. After review of her story, Mr. Mathur determined the State's case was weak at best. Mr. Mathur has previously tried this charge and understands the defenses. Mr. Mathur provided instructions on the case and Mr. De La Garza reviewed the evidence and argued the legal and factual defenses on the case. The case was outright dismissed! Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. De La Garza.
Mr. A's family contacted us after he pleaded guilty to a family violence offense. Mr. A, an immigrant from Syria, did not fully understand the judicial process. Since Mr. A was a resident with a pending naturalization case, Mr. A did not want the conviction on his records. Mr. Mathur and his team went to work on file a Habeas Corpus Writ to reverse the criminal conviction. The criminal conviction was ultimately reversed by the Dallas courts and thereafter, the case was dismissed by the prosecution. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Obiaju.
Ms. M was charged with being deportable and was accused of felony injury to a child. Ms. M was transferred from Rusk County Jail to ICE. ICE originally offered Ms. M bond, but when her family went to pay the ICE bond, the bond offer had been withdrawn. Ms. Ball submitted a request for hearing on bond redetermination. At the Bond Hearing Ms. Ball convinced the Judge to grant a bond of $5,000.00. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Ball.
Mr. JA was detained by ICE when he was arrested on alleged domestic assault charges. Mr. Zumberg filed a bond application and convinced the Court that Mr. JA was eligible for bond despite the serious nature of the charge. ICE opposed bond claiming that Mr. JA was a public safety danger. Despite ICE's opposition, the Immigration Judge granted bond at just $4,000. Result by Mr. Zumberg
Mr. R had been a long-standing client of our firm. He had a pending petition and consular processing. Mr. R was arrested for a criminal violation and held in the county jail. After obtaining a bond reduction to only $1000.00 cash for the criminal case, Mr. Mathur drafted correspondence to ICE officers requesting that a bond be set. Mr. Mathur explained his client's nonviolent criminal history, petition and approval and the bogus nature of the criminal charge. ICE set a low bond and Mr. R was released! Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mr. D is an immigrant on a valid work visa. New to this country, he agreed to meet a girl online. After agreeing to meet her in person, a brief sexual encounter occurred. The girl would later accuse Mr. D of raping her. While the charges were investigated, Mr. Mathur and his legal team represented Mr. D. The case was eventually forwarded to the District Attorney, who took the case and planned to present it to a Grand Jury. Mr. Mathur and Mr. De La Garza, worked hard to point out the inconsistencies in the complainant's allegations and were able to secure a "no bill" wherein the Grand Jury declined to find probable cause and discontinued the prosecution of the case. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. De La Garza.
Mr. F came our firm in distress to visit with Mr. Mathur. After advising Mr. Mathur he was on probation and was being charged with assaulting his partner, Mr. Mathur was concerned not only about the pending allegation but also the probation violation that could occur. After hearing the entire story of the alleged Aggravated Assault, Mr. Mathur felt that the case could be won in front of the Grand Jury to prevent the case from being filed and the probation violation from occurring. Mr. Mathur and Mr. De La Garza worked on getting evidence to disprove the Aggravated Assault charge. A package of information, including witness statements, photos and other evidence was introduced to the Dallas County Grand Jury. The Grand Jury agreed there was no probable cause for the case to move forward and dismissed the charge. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. De La Garza.
Mr. E came to visit Mr. Mathur after being accused of a felony theft. The alleged offense was theft of around $250,000.00. After investigation it appeared that another person had taken money from a business account. Mr. E was innocent. Mr. Mathur requested the third party to confess. The third party finally confessed and provided a statement. Mr. Mathur then convinced the State of Texas to file against the third party. After years of investigation and negotiations, the case was finally dismissed. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. De La Garza.
Mr. R came to Mathur Law Offices as he needed an experienced criminal and immigration lawyer. Mr. Mathur devised instructions on how to keep Mr. R from being placed on probation and or going back to jail as he was an immigrant and may face removal from the U.S. Mr. Mathur and Mr. De La Garza worked on getting the case dismissed. Mr. R's case was dismissed without a conviction under immigration law and without being placed in ICE custody. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. De La Garza.
Ms. S came to Mathur Law Offices concerned and worried about an accusation of theft. Worried about her future and her clean history as well as her immigration status, she wanted to take no chances of a conviction. Mr. De La Garza took the case. With Mr. Mathur and Mr. De La Garza executing a plan to dismiss, the case was dismissed. Result by Mr. De La Garza and Mr. Mathur.
Mr. J.M. hired the firm after being arrested for DWI. Mr. J.M. was a legal immigrant, Lawful Permanent Resident. Mr. J.M. was applying to be a U.S. citizen so the timing of the arrest could not be worse. After investigating the case and finding problems with the procedures of the police, the firm was able to convince the prosecution to reject the case and decline prosecution. This allows Mr. J.M. to proceed with his application to be a U.S. citizen. Result by Mr. Nieto and Mr. Mathur.
After being placed in removal proceedings, Mr. C came to the Mathur Law Offices. The Immigration Judge wrongfully denied Mr. C's application to remain in the country. The Mathur firm took the case on appeal. While on appeal, the Mathur firm worked on a remand and dismissal of the removal case. The case was sent back to the Immigration Judge and dismissed. Once that dismissal occurred, the Mathur firm continued on the residency petition with immigration services. The case was approved, and eleven years later, Mr. C has his residency and can remain in the United States permanently. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Ball.
Mr. M has been a client of Mathur Law Offices, P.C. in the past. Mr. M did not hesitate to contact the Mathur team the minute he was accused of DWI and arrested in Denton County. The Mathur team went to work seeking all the discovery in the case and carefully reviewing multiple body cams. When the discovery revealed police misconduct, the Mathur team filed a Motion to Suppress. The State of Texas offered to lower charges. The Mathur team refused as justice had to be done in court. Rather than face the judge and expose the police misconduct, the State of Texas dismissed the case, resulting in a win for Mr. M. Result by Mr. Nieto and Mr. Mathur.
Ms. C came to visit Mr. Mathur after becoming tired of her husband's ways. According to Ms. C, her husband was drinking, using drugs and visiting places of ill repute. Ms. C had enough. Ms. C wanted to protect herself and get a fresh start. There was over $700,000.00 of debt accumulated during the marriage with very little in the way of assets. Mr. Mathur was able to settle the case with Ms. C walking away without any debt to be paid, maximum child support and spousal support for three (3) years. Ms. C pays none of the debt. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Beuerlein.
Ms. H was referred to Mr. Mathur by a friend. When reviewing Ms. H's case, Mr. Mathur ascertained that she had pleaded guilty to drug manufacturing and delivery. This would cause the permanent loss of Ms. H's green card. Ms. H was already in removal proceedings. Mr. Mathur and his team went to work quickly to have the criminal case reversed. Ms. Obiaju and Mr. Mathur prepared a Writ of Habeas Corpus to prove to the Court that Ms. H was misled into the plea and that she was not advised of the devastating immigration consequences. On hearing before the District Judge, Mr. Mathur proved that no rational person would have entered the plea deal with a resident alien card. The pleas in both cases were Ordered withdrawn. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Obiaju.
Mr. G from Mexico entered US without inspection. He was charged with possession of drugs that made him removable from US. Mr. Mathur worked on his criminal case to get the charges dismissed. Mr. Mathur advised Mr. G to file for immigration status through his US citizen wife. Ms. Sinha worked on the immigration case under Mr. Mathur’s supervision. Ms. Sinha prepared all evidences with strong argument for approval and represented Mr. G at USCIS. USCIS approved Mr. G's case and granted resident status. Mr. G is now a permanent resident of US.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. G came to see Mr. Mathur in 2019. He was a Lawful Permanent Resident who had been convicted of a felony drug charge. As such, he was subject to removal from the United States without any eligibility to stay. Mr. Mathur and his team went to work on his criminal conviction. The Mathur team was able to find grievous errors in the way the lawyer who represented Mr. G had handled the case. A Writ to undo the criminal conviction was filed and heard by the Court. The criminal court reversed the plea. The Mathur team had the criminal case records expunged and later filed for naturalization to be a U.S. Citizen. Mr. G takes his Oath to be a U.S. citizen tomorrow as his case has been approved. Result by Ms. Renaud and Mr. Mathur.
Mr. K filed an I-130 Petition for Alien Relative for his wife who lives outside of the United States. This petition was filed in January of 2015 by a prior attorney. After unduly delays on behalf of USCIS the client receive a Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID) in January 2019. Mathur Law Offices responded to this NOID with additional documents and affidavits of support from client and family. Client received an additional NOID in January 2020. Attorney Ball again responded to the government, specifically arguing that the USCIS Officer was misapplying the law. Less than two weeks later Mathur Law Offices received the approval notice Mr. K's I-130. Mr. K can now look forward to reuniting with his wife and young child. Result by Ms. Ball and Mr. Mathur.
Mr. J has been a long time client of Mr. Mathur. When he first met Mr. Mathur, Mr. J had been charged with money laundering in federal court. With Mr. Mathur as outside immigration counsel, negotiations were completed to dismiss the charges against Mr. J. Later, Mr. Mathur filed for Mr. J’s resident status through his 21 year old daughter. After years of being a resident, Mr. Mathur filed Mr. J’s naturalization. The records were proved up and argument was made that Mr. J was eligible for naturalization. USCIS agreed and approved the case for Oath. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mr. G from Mexico entered the USA without inspection. Her permanent resident father had petitioned for him. Based on family preference category eligibility, Mr. G was to stay unmarried to get benefits from the filed petition. USCIS could consider common law marriage rules regarding Mr. G's marital status and hence deny any relief for him. Ms. Sinha under Mr. Mathur's supervision worked on the case and prepared legal arguments to overcome the common law marriage presumption. Ms. Sinha represented Mr. G at the USCIS interview for adjustment of status. Mr. G's case was granted, and he is now a permanent resident of US.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. Z was charged with violating his probation and looking at time in jail. The defense team at Mathur Law Offices was able to prove that the revocation would not stand, and the case was dismissed! Result by Mr. De La Garza and Mr. Mathur.
Mr. P was accused of soliciting a prostitute. The ramifications to his family, career, and immigration status were enormous. Mr. P trusted the Mathur team to defend him. After months of work and defense, the case was dismissed! Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. De La Garza.
Mr. P hired the firm when he was placed in removal proceedings. In fighting the removal proceedings, it also became apparent that Mr. P could not be convicted for a pending Prostitution charge. The Mathur team went to fight on both fronts. Mr. P's Prostitution charge was dismissed which secures his right to continue representation on his removal case. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. De La Garza!
Mr. P hired Mathur Law Offices to apply for naturalization due to concerns over his criminal history. Mr. Zumberg represented Mr. P during his N-400 naturalization interview, and protected the record. The interviewing officer recommended that Mr. P receive U.S. Citizenship, but was later overruled by his supervisor due to Mr. P's criminal history. Mr. Zumberg continued to protect the record while briefing the issue, and ultimately convinced USCIS to approve Mr. P's naturalization. As a result, Mr. P was able to realize his dreams and become a U.S. Citizen. Result by Mr. Zumberg and Mr. Mathur.
Mr. R came to the Mathur Law Offices when he was charged with an assault by a co-worker. The co-worker asserted that Mr. R had assaulted her many times before. After an investigation of the case, it became clear that the complainant's credibility was in question. The prosecution would not back off. The case had to be tried. During the trial, the defense requested that all prior complaints be excluded. This was granted by the Judge. The case was tried by a jury that returned a Not Guilty verdict in less than five minutes of deliberation. Result by Mr. Nieto and Mr. Mathur.
Mr. BK came to the Mathur Law Offices when ordered to pay over $100k in child support. Mr. BK requested that our firm request the Judge reverse their decision as incorrect due to prior proceedings wherein we were not his counsel. The Mathur team went to work on filing a Motion for New Trial and obtaining a hearing date within time limitations. With the legal arguments and briefings, as well as arguments in Court, the Court reversed its own decision and cut the child support arrears award by approximately $50,000.00. Results by Ms. Byno and Mr. Mathur.
Mr. G hired our firm because he was on an H1 visa and was very concerned about a criminal allegation for Felony Injury to a Child. Realizing the severe consequences to Mr. G from a felony charge, the Mathur team went to work to try to stop the case before the Dallas County Grand Jury. Mr. Mathur and Mr. De La Garza ensure that defensive documents were submitted. The Grand Jury convened and "No Billed" or dismissed the case finding no probable cause. Not only does this secure Mr. G from removal and inadmissibility but it also prevents him from the expense of going to Court and defending himself at trial. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. De La Garza.
Mr. O came into the U.S. as student. He married a U.S. citizen. He was represented by other counsel. Other counsel was unable to get his case approved and an I-130 Notice of Intent to Deny was issued. Allegations were made of sexual assault. Mr. O was picked up by ICE. Mr. O's family came to Mr. Mathur desperate for a turn around. The Mathur team cleared up the inconsistencies with the marital issues and applied for bond where the sexual assault allegations were rebuked. Bond was granted and Mr. O was released. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Ball.
Mr. C's family hired Mathur Law Offices after Mr. C was arrested by ICE. Mr. Mathur reviewed Mr. C's past criminal history and determined he would not be eligible for bond or immigration relief at his future court date. Mr. Mathur immediately recommended that the weapons charge that was preventing relief be lifted if possible. Mr. Mathur filed a Late Motion for New Trial in Panola County, Texas. The District Attorney and Mr. Mathur worked through due process issues related to the issues. The Court GRANTED the Motion for New Trial and a dismissal of the charge was obtained. This clears the path to Mr. C's application for relief before the Immigration Judge. Mr. Mathur accomplished all of this before the first immigration court date.
Mr. R from Mexico entered the USA without inspection. He later married a U.S. citizen. Mr. R hired Mathur Law Offices to get resident status for him. Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha advised Mr. R to file an immigrant petition and consular process with a provisional waiver. Mr. Mathur worked on the criminal case to get court orders for eligibility for immigration relief. Ms. Sinha guided and helped Mr. R through the process and prepared a strong provisional waiver. Based on legal argument and evidence submitted, USCIS granted the provisional waiver. Mr. R's case was approved at the consulate in Mexico. He was granted permanent resident status in US.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. A, an honorably discharged veteran, came to the Mathur Law Offices regarding his wrongful arrest for public intoxication. He had been removed from a commercial flight at DFW airport after a flight attendant mistook his emotional condition (grieving the death of a loved one) for intoxication, and he was subsequently arrested and faced criminal charges. After demanding evidence and proof from the prosecutor, Attorney De La Garza was able to get a dismissal of this case after showing the arrest was improper. Mr. A was then able to petition to remove this arrest from his record so that it would not affect his future career or place a black mark on his many military and professional commendations.
Mr. M was referred to the firm by a local immigration lawyer. The referring lawyer knew that Mr. M had almost no chance of getting his immigration status with a family violence conviction arising from a July 5, 1999, conviction. Mr. Mathur and Ms. Ball went to work investigating the case, preparing arguments related to ineffective assistance of his previous counsel and conducting hearings relating to the withdrawal of his plea of guilt. The prosecution fought the case at the hearing and Mr. Mathur was able to successfully argue the case in Court. The Judge required legal arguments, which were made by Ms. Ball and ultimately, the case was won and the plea withdrawn. This paves the way for Mr. SM's immigration. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Ball.
Mr. M was referred to the firm by a local immigration lawyer. The referring lawyer knew that Mr. M had almost no chance of getting his immigration status with a family violence conviction arising from a July 5, 1999, conviction. Mr. Mathur and Ms. Ball went to work investigating the case, preparing arguments related to ineffective assistance of his previous counsel and conducting hearings relating to the withdrawal of his plea of guilt. The prosecution fought the case at the hearing and Mr. Mathur was able to successfully argue the case in Court. The Judge required legal arguments, which were made by Ms. Ball and ultimately, the case was won and the plea withdrawn. This paves the way for Mr. SM's immigration. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Ball.
Mr. N had no way of becoming legal. Mr. N had a criminal conviction that barred him from obtaining his residency. Mr. Mathur filed post-conviction relief to reverse the criminal conviction and won. Thereafter, Mr. Mathur and his team filed for Mr. N's residency, which was approved. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mr. S, a citizen of Mexico, married a US citizen in good faith and became a conditional resident. Soon after marriage, his wife separated from him and filed for divorce. Mr. S consulted with Mathur Law Offices and Ms. Sinha advised him on filing for removal of conditions with waiver. Ms. Sinha worked on making a strong case with all pertinent documents requesting waiver for Mr. S. Ms. Sinha prepared convincing legal argument for the approval of his case. Based on the evidence and arguments submitted, USCIS approved Mr. S’s application without any interview. Mr. R is now permanent residents of US and are also eligible to become a US citizen. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. R, a citizen of Nepal, became a conditional resident based on good faith marriage to his wife. His wife committed adultery and the marriage did not work out. Mr. R consulted with Mathur Law Offices and Mr. Mathur advised him on filing for divorce and removal of conditions with waiver. Ms. Sinha then filed for removal of conditions application with all pertinent documents requesting waiver for Mr. R. Ms. Sinha worked on preparing a strong case with evidence of bona fide marriage. Based on the evidence submitted, USCIS approved Mr. R’s application. The Mr. R. did not have to go for any interview. Mr. R is now permanent residents of US and are also eligible to become a US citizen soon. Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
A.C. hired the firm after going through a U.S. Customs and border airport checkpoint. The Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) apprehended the client and detained the client on suspicion of money laundering. The CBP officer seized thousands in cash. After seizing the cash, A.C. came to the Mathur team for help. After contesting the seizure and providing evidence and argument CBP and DHS agreed to return almost all of the money. Result by Ms. Ball and Mr. Mathur.
Mr. S and his brother invested in a company which turned out to be a Ponzi scheme. Prior to discovering the fraudulent activity Mr. S and his brother invested over $200k in the business. In addition, Mr. S and his brother along with other investors personally guaranteed over a million dollars in loans to the company. When the company defaulted, the bank sought to recover the loan deficiency from Mr. S and the other guarantors. Mr. Mathur and Mr. Beuerlein successfully negotiated a settlement for 10% of the liability to both Mr. S and his brother in exchange for a full release. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Beuerlein.
Mr. C originally came to see Mr. Mathur when he was charged with theft. Mr. C had been charged with taking valuable items from a store in an amount that would subject him to a potential long jail sentence. Mr. C worked with the Mathur team to ensure that the prosecution exercised discretion and that Mr. C was shown to be rehabilitated. Following the advice of the Mathur team, Mr. C gathered information and followed recommendations that were used by the prosecution to persuade that the case was dismissed. After dismissal, the Mathur team worked on an expunction of the records. After expunction, Mr. C re-hired Mr. Mathur to personally work on his adjustment of status based on an employment-based relationship. Mr. Mathur presented the case to USCIS, and it was approved within a week. Result by Mr. Mathur.
Mr. KK came to Mathur Law Offices to help him secure his U.S. Citizenship. Mr. KK had been arrested and imprisoned for multiple DWI's, calling into question his suitability for naturalization. Mr. Zumberg prepared Mr. KK's application and carefully documented his criminal history, resulting in Mr. KK's Citizenship application being approved without issue. Result by Mr. Zumberg and Mr. Mathur.
Ms. B from India entered the USA with a visa. Her permanent resident father had petitioned for her and later became a US citizen. Based on family preference category eligibility, Ms. B filed to get her resident status in US. USCIS denied Ms. B's case. Ms. B hired Mathur Law Offices to reopen her case. Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha advised to file a Motion to Reopen the case. Ms. Sinha worked on the case and prepared strong legal arguments. Based on legal argument and evidence submitted, USCIS reopened the case. Ms. Sinha represented Ms. B at the USCIS interview for adjustment of status. Ms. B's case was granted, and she is now a permanent resident of US.
Result by Mr. Mathur and Ms. Sinha.
Mr. B previously retained Mathur Law Offices to represent him in removal proceedings. Mr. Mathur represented Mr. B before the Dallas Immigration Court and convinced the Immigration Judge to cancel Mr. B's removal. Years later, Mr. B returned to Mr. Mathur to pursue his naturalization. Mr. B was very concerned because of his previous encounters with ICE, and his long criminal history including arrests for suspicion of DWI and domestic assault, as well as convictions for DWI, possession of a controlled substance, and DWI with a Child Passenger. Mr. Zumberg prepared Mr. B's N-400 application and represented Mr. B during a hostile naturalization interview. Mr. Zumberg protected Mr. B's rights, protected and clarified the record, and ensured that the hearing was not conducted in an arbitrary manner. Mr. B was able to realize his dream of becoming a U.S. Citizen. Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Zumberg
Mr. MA was placed in removal proceedings over 10 years ago when his naturalization application was denied due to his criminal background and alleged immigration fraud. Mr. Mathur presented a technical argument to the Court as to the flaws in the Government's position and persuaded the Court to terminate Mr. MA's removal proceedings. Mr. MA secured his permanent resident status, and Mr. Zumberg prepared Mr. MA's naturalization package. Mr. Zumberg represented Mr. MA at multiple interviews before USCIS, and Mr. MA was able to become a U.S. Citizen despite his past criminal and immigration history! Result by Mr. Mathur and Mr. Zumberg.